Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 41041 - 41050 of 69024 for had.
Search results 41041 - 41050 of 69024 for had.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
judgment motion, ruling: (1) Ocwen had standing; (2) Ocwen’s affidavits sufficiently supported
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131986 - 2017-09-21
judgment motion, ruling: (1) Ocwen had standing; (2) Ocwen’s affidavits sufficiently supported
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131986 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Douglas Royster
it was undisputed that the machines Royster had broken into were not gas-powered. A defendant who requests
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9122 - 2017-09-19
it was undisputed that the machines Royster had broken into were not gas-powered. A defendant who requests
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9122 - 2017-09-19
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Gerald Proost
she did not have her glasses. Anna P. later learned that she had signed over to Attorney Proost
/sc/dispord/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20057 - 2005-10-20
she did not have her glasses. Anna P. later learned that she had signed over to Attorney Proost
/sc/dispord/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20057 - 2005-10-20
[PDF]
Jerold I. Giesie v. General Casualty Company of Wisconsin
. ¶4 General Casualty deducted the $10,000 it had already paid for Karen’s medical expenses
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19758 - 2017-09-21
. ¶4 General Casualty deducted the $10,000 it had already paid for Karen’s medical expenses
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19758 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Robert L. Taylor
that Attorney Taylor's reinstatement petition be denied because Attorney Taylor had not shown by clear
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26346 - 2017-09-21
that Attorney Taylor's reinstatement petition be denied because Attorney Taylor had not shown by clear
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26346 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
and the victim’s witnesses’ criminal records; (7) that the victim’s family and friends, some of whom had
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=989789 - 2025-07-30
and the victim’s witnesses’ criminal records; (7) that the victim’s family and friends, some of whom had
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=989789 - 2025-07-30
State v. Larry W. Norris
in the burglarized premises had a trigger lock and therefore could not be considered a dangerous weapon. We first
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11171 - 2005-03-31
in the burglarized premises had a trigger lock and therefore could not be considered a dangerous weapon. We first
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11171 - 2005-03-31
State v. Trederick Nelson
in violation of § 947.01, Stats., for an altercation he had with Angela B.S. at a school in Menomonee Falls
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14804 - 2005-03-31
in violation of § 947.01, Stats., for an altercation he had with Angela B.S. at a school in Menomonee Falls
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14804 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Loren L. Leiser
of justice. The trial court summarily denied this—his third postconviction motion—because he had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25141 - 2017-09-21
of justice. The trial court summarily denied this—his third postconviction motion—because he had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25141 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
door, and then entering her home. The victim recognized Holland because Holland had previously done
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=214238 - 2018-06-14
door, and then entering her home. The victim recognized Holland because Holland had previously done
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=214238 - 2018-06-14