Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 41041 - 41050 of 46103 for paternity test paper work.

COURT OF APPEALS
test, and conclude that trial counsel’s failure to object to the portion of the statement regarding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=77359 - 2012-01-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of the ineffective assistance test, we need not address the other. State v. Evans, 187 Wis. 2d 66, 93, 522 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=73090 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] CA Blank Order
. We assess claims of ineffective assistance of counsel under the two- prong test described
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=147257 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] WI APP 169
it that it could. Finally, by polling the jurors, the court tested the uncoerced unanimity of the jury verdict
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29338 - 2014-09-15

State v. Felicia J.
. Evidence was also presented that shortly before Tizell was born, she tested positive for drug use. Her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6391 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
prongs of the Strickland test involve mixed questions of law and fact. Taylor, 272 Wis. 2d 642, ¶14. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=67962 - 2011-07-19

[PDF] State v. Randolph P. Haushalter
process requires fair notice and proper standards for adjudication. The test for vagueness
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15125 - 2017-09-21

State v. Randolph P. Haushalter
that procedural due process requires fair notice and proper standards for adjudication. The test for vagueness
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15123 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Robert Junior Carr
on the street….” The trial court ordered weekly drug tests for the first year on extended supervision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18142 - 2017-09-21

Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Jay Andrew Felli
would adopt a "substantially related" test for violations that were not established by Office of Lawyer
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18293 - 2005-05-24