Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 41051 - 41060 of 59327 for SMALL CLAIMS.

CJT & L, Inc. v. Daryl A. Larson
and D’Amico claimed damages of $118,817.62, which they detailed in Exhibit 13. The damages listed on Exhibit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21162 - 2006-01-30

COURT OF APPEALS
and circumstances, whether the defendant can receive a fair trial” despite the claimed error. State v. Ford, 2007
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51343 - 2010-06-23

COURT OF APPEALS
cost of preparing the transcript. A defendant claiming an inability to pay with regard to the bond
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90905 - 2012-12-20

State v. Gary Cembrowski
, Cembrowski moved to withdraw his plea, claiming that he had not understood the elements of the crime
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12111 - 2009-08-03

[PDF] Mary K. Fischer v. The AmPacis Company
of the conditions precedent necessary for him to receive insurance coverage through AmPacis. AmPacis claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9963 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Industry to Industry, Inc. v. Hillsman Modular Molding, Inc.
for partial summary judgment requesting dismissal of Industry’s WIS. STAT. § 134.93 claim. Hillsman
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2913 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Benjamin Mora
statements involuntary. To resolve a defendant’s claim that a statement was made in violation of his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2985 - 2017-09-19

State v. Pastori M. Balele
pending Balele's appeal--denied his request for a stay and proceeded to take evidence on his claim that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9591 - 2005-03-31

State v. Andrew M. Sherrod
to deliver and burglary with intent to commit a felony. On appeal, Sherrod claims that there was no evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8958 - 2005-03-31

Gary P. Ellis v. Sawyer County Board of Appeals
, oppressive or unreasonable. The Ellises only claim that “[b]y proceeding under incorrect theories of law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6311 - 2005-03-31