Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 41071 - 41080 of 63758 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 41071 - 41080 of 63758 for Motion for joint custody.
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
the requested witness, and Greene was again found guilty. Greene filed a motion in circuit court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93535 - 2014-09-15
the requested witness, and Greene was again found guilty. Greene filed a motion in circuit court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93535 - 2014-09-15
State v. Andre Crockett
. PER CURIAM. Andre Crockett appeals from a judgment of conviction and an order denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9645 - 2005-03-31
. PER CURIAM. Andre Crockett appeals from a judgment of conviction and an order denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9645 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the circuit court denied his motion to suppress statements he made while the police were executing a search
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208751 - 2018-02-21
the circuit court denied his motion to suppress statements he made while the police were executing a search
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208751 - 2018-02-21
State v. Larry D. Cook
. The record discloses no prejudicial error in the conduct of the trial or in the pretrial motions. Most
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10362 - 2005-03-31
. The record discloses no prejudicial error in the conduct of the trial or in the pretrial motions. Most
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10362 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Anne Kathleen Reilly
granted the motion for default judgment on December 7, 2005. On February 6, 2006 the referee issued his
/sc/dispord/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24689 - 2017-09-21
granted the motion for default judgment on December 7, 2005. On February 6, 2006 the referee issued his
/sc/dispord/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24689 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Donald Sherman
after the trial court denied his motion to suppress the State’s evidence. The issue is whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15320 - 2017-09-21
after the trial court denied his motion to suppress the State’s evidence. The issue is whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15320 - 2017-09-21
Patrick DeMauro v. Peter R. Szukis
of an agreement. DeMauro also argues that the trial court erred by not granting his summary judgment motion before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14045 - 2005-03-31
of an agreement. DeMauro also argues that the trial court erred by not granting his summary judgment motion before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14045 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
withdrawal, counsel would then file a postconviction motion seeking that relief, not a no-merit appeal
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108237 - 2017-09-21
withdrawal, counsel would then file a postconviction motion seeking that relief, not a no-merit appeal
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108237 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
) (reviewing the denial of motion to suppress based on alleged misrepresentation in the search warrant
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=607154 - 2023-01-04
) (reviewing the denial of motion to suppress based on alleged misrepresentation in the search warrant
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=607154 - 2023-01-04
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
by not filing any suppression motions beyond the one motion that was filed. In reaching this conclusion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1022586 - 2025-10-16
by not filing any suppression motions beyond the one motion that was filed. In reaching this conclusion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1022586 - 2025-10-16