Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 41081 - 41090 of 74475 for a ha.
Search results 41081 - 41090 of 74475 for a ha.
[PDF]
State v. Daniel T. Shea
). Shea has submitted nothing, other than his own allegations, to call the trial court’s factual finding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2759 - 2017-09-19
). Shea has submitted nothing, other than his own allegations, to call the trial court’s factual finding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2759 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
notified that the Court has entered the following opinion and order: 2019AP97-CRNM State
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=258006 - 2020-04-15
notified that the Court has entered the following opinion and order: 2019AP97-CRNM State
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=258006 - 2020-04-15
[PDF]
Court of Appeals Statistics January 2025
issued in the form of a court order after the court has reviewed the briefs and the record
/ca/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=913925 - 2025-02-10
issued in the form of a court order after the court has reviewed the briefs and the record
/ca/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=913925 - 2025-02-10
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
53081 You are hereby notified that the Court has entered the following opinion and order
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=708001 - 2023-09-27
53081 You are hereby notified that the Court has entered the following opinion and order
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=708001 - 2023-09-27
[PDF]
State v. Gregory J. Paulson
value at the time it was lost or destroyed.1 Id. Paulson has not established that the destroyed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10556 - 2017-09-20
value at the time it was lost or destroyed.1 Id. Paulson has not established that the destroyed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10556 - 2017-09-20
Thomas Richmond v. William Puckett
has been deemed unsuitable.” Judicial review of certiorari actions is limited to: “‘(1) Whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11635 - 2005-03-31
has been deemed unsuitable.” Judicial review of certiorari actions is limited to: “‘(1) Whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11635 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
You are hereby notified that the Court has entered the following opinion and order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=761414 - 2024-02-14
You are hereby notified that the Court has entered the following opinion and order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=761414 - 2024-02-14
State v. David L.s.
to file a response. He has not responded. From our independent review of the record, we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8796 - 2005-03-31
to file a response. He has not responded. From our independent review of the record, we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8796 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that the Court has entered the following opinion and order: 2017AP973 State of Wisconsin ex rel
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=212916 - 2018-05-23
that the Court has entered the following opinion and order: 2017AP973 State of Wisconsin ex rel
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=212916 - 2018-05-23
COURT OF APPEALS
rights have been violated because he has not been appointed an attorney to “mount [] a substantial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49296 - 2010-04-26
rights have been violated because he has not been appointed an attorney to “mount [] a substantial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49296 - 2010-04-26