Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 41081 - 41090 of 83395 for case search.

Manitowoc County Department of Social Services v. Shannon T.
of the various hearings in this case, it is apparent that the circuit court’s conclusion that Shannon understood
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14320 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2015-16). 1 Because
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194442 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Francesca Poulin v. Indian Community School
, the plaintiffs moved to voluntarily dismiss the school from the case. Over objection from the school
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15211 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Donald Rumage v. Robert M. Gullberg
foreclosure case. The issue is whether a properly docketed judgment in favor of Donald Rumage against
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11421 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] WI APP 65
2010 WI APP 65 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2009AP94
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=48817 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Matthew Kulbiski v. Michael DeMarco
any impact on the case. We affirm the judgment. ¶2 The following facts are undisputed. A vehicle
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5386 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS
by a remand. He relies on cases such as State ex rel. Jones v. Franklin, 151 Wis. 2d 419, 423, 444 N.W.2d 738
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32518 - 2008-04-23

Nicole R. Walton v. The Home Indemnity Corporation
a claim for relief, we determine “whether the moving party has made a prima facie case for summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8745 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Darrell C. Solfest
, the issue presented by this case is one of statutory construction. As such, a de novo standard of review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12201 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
At a January 2022 hearing, the circuit court granted Krekeler’s motion. The court reasoned that “the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=652426 - 2023-05-04