Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4111 - 4120 of 18714 for quote.

COURT OF APPEALS
novo.’” State v. Bailey, 2009 WI App 140, ¶14, 321 Wis. 2d 350, 773 N.W.2d 488 (quoted source omitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142162 - 2015-05-20

COURT OF APPEALS
be subject to improper use by the jury.’” Id. (quoting State v. Jensen, 147 Wis. 2d 240, 260, 432 N.W.2d 913
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109900 - 2013-10-31

School District of Waukesha v. School District Boundary Appeal Board
” and not the result of the “winnowing and sifting” process. Id. (quoted source omitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8854 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Jerrell C.J.
. It is indefinite in character." State v. Jennings, 2002 WI 44, ¶13, 252 Wis. 2d 228, 647 N.W.2d 142 (quoting
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18921 - 2017-09-21

State v. Jerrell C.J.
, 647 N.W.2d 142 (quoting State ex rel. Fourth National Bank of Philadelphia v. Johnson, 103 Wis. 591
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18921 - 2005-07-06

[PDF] State v. Larry D. Benoit
.2d 585, 590-91, 478 N.W.2d 37, 39 (Ct. App. 1991) (quoted source omitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7853 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. John W. Kelley
is not challenged on appeal. The quoted facts are from the “Memorandum Decision” signed and dated by the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15420 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] La Crosse County Department of Human Services v. Rosemary S.A.
., is quoted and discussed below in the text. No. 99-2038 99-2039 99-2040 99-2041 4 to one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15826 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
(quoting WIS. STAT. § 32.19(4) (1965)). It now states that rental losses are compensable only if “[t]he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=368803 - 2021-05-27

COURT OF APPEALS
acts are ‘separated in time or are of a significantly different nature.’” Id., ¶31 (quoting State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94485 - 2013-03-25