Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 41101 - 41110 of 83345 for case search.
Search results 41101 - 41110 of 83345 for case search.
[PDF]
NOTICE
history report” in capital cases, and American Bar Association guidelines for death penalty cases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35792 - 2014-09-15
history report” in capital cases, and American Bar Association guidelines for death penalty cases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35792 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
to order restitution in this case but remand for further proceedings as to the amount—it is unclear from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90981 - 2013-01-02
to order restitution in this case but remand for further proceedings as to the amount—it is unclear from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90981 - 2013-01-02
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the instruction of second-degree reckless homicide because it was not appropriate under the facts of the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=372086 - 2021-06-02
the instruction of second-degree reckless homicide because it was not appropriate under the facts of the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=372086 - 2021-06-02
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=801768 - 2024-05-21
review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=801768 - 2024-05-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
reasoned that, given the facts of the case, there was reasonable suspicion to extend the stop for field
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103040 - 2017-09-21
reasoned that, given the facts of the case, there was reasonable suspicion to extend the stop for field
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103040 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
sentencing discretion in 2000 by considering improper factors; (2) a United States Supreme Court case decided
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48903 - 2010-04-12
sentencing discretion in 2000 by considering improper factors; (2) a United States Supreme Court case decided
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48903 - 2010-04-12
State v. Anthony D. Gritz
. In this case, Gritz was not convicted of disorderly conduct solely because he used profanity and “fighting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12889 - 2005-03-31
. In this case, Gritz was not convicted of disorderly conduct solely because he used profanity and “fighting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12889 - 2005-03-31
State v. Donald C.
motion to adjourn the trial date. The trial court, appropriately reluctant to adjourn the case again
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6706 - 2005-03-31
motion to adjourn the trial date. The trial court, appropriately reluctant to adjourn the case again
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6706 - 2005-03-31
State v. Tecia D.B.
visitation. ¶4 Dawn Richardson, the social worker assigned to Tecia’s case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6835 - 2005-03-31
visitation. ¶4 Dawn Richardson, the social worker assigned to Tecia’s case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6835 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
and has developed significant experience in deciding cases involving the issue of mandatory bargaining
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29993 - 2007-08-15
and has developed significant experience in deciding cases involving the issue of mandatory bargaining
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29993 - 2007-08-15