Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 41101 - 41110 of 82617 for judgment for m s.

La Crosse County Department of Human Services v. Stacey C.
ROGGENSACK, J.[1] Stacey C.’s parental rights to her son, James J., were terminated by an order filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5007 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 6, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court...
, v. Reginald S. Curtis, Defendant-Appellant. APPEAL
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28013 - 2007-02-05

[PDF] La Crosse County Department of Human Services v. Stacey C.
ROGGENSACK, J. 1 Stacey C.’s parental rights to her son, James J., were terminated by an order filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5007 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] FICE OF THE CLERK
in WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23(3). Elijah J. Willis appeals from judgments convicting him of misdemeanor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=913151 - 2025-02-12

[PDF] NOTICE
must defer to the credibility determinations made by the commission because it “hear[s] and see[s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=57413 - 2014-09-15

Urlene Lilly v. Wisconsin Department of Health and Social Services
circumstances had occurred. The circuit court reasoned: [Lilly]'s benefits were terminated not because her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8906 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] NOTICE
OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT I IN THE INTEREST OF MACK S., A PERSON UNDER THE AGE OF 17
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32345 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
DISTRICT I In the interest of Mack S., a person under the age of 17: State of Wisconsin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32345 - 2008-04-07

[PDF] State v. Matthew J. Knapp
to 1 Wisconsin v. Knapp, ___U.S.___, 124 S. Ct. 2932 (Wis. Jun. 30, 2004) (No. 03-590). 2 Miranda
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19017 - 2017-09-21

State v. Matthew J. Knapp
, 124 S. Ct. 2620 (2004), in which a plurality of the Court concluded that the fruit of the poisonous
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19017 - 2005-07-13