Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 41111 - 41120 of 68274 for did.
Search results 41111 - 41120 of 68274 for did.
State v. Charles A. Toal
suspension of his operating privileges, did not constitute multiple punishments, and did not violate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11084 - 2005-03-31
suspension of his operating privileges, did not constitute multiple punishments, and did not violate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11084 - 2005-03-31
Jeffrey E. Sobczak v. Eleanor Ciganek
because Sobczak did not substantiate his claim with the testimony of a vocational expert. To support her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3371 - 2005-03-31
because Sobczak did not substantiate his claim with the testimony of a vocational expert. To support her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3371 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
the constitutional right to counsel. Davis v. United States, 512 U.S. 452, 461-62 (1994). Lear concedes, as he did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35549 - 2009-02-16
the constitutional right to counsel. Davis v. United States, 512 U.S. 452, 461-62 (1994). Lear concedes, as he did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35549 - 2009-02-16
State v. Stacey R. Piper
because he incorrectly assumed that Piper’s car did not have anti-lock brakes when he reconstructed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25277 - 2006-05-24
because he incorrectly assumed that Piper’s car did not have anti-lock brakes when he reconstructed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25277 - 2006-05-24
COURT OF APPEALS
appraisal.[1] We reject these arguments and affirm the judgment. ¶2 The court did not make findings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72523 - 2011-10-19
appraisal.[1] We reject these arguments and affirm the judgment. ¶2 The court did not make findings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72523 - 2011-10-19
Nicholas A. Livingston v. Wausau Underwriters Insurance Company
did not have a ministerial duty to conduct and supervise her physical education class in a particular
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5425 - 2005-03-31
did not have a ministerial duty to conduct and supervise her physical education class in a particular
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5425 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
did was make Hawkins eligible for the programs; it did not mandate his participation in them
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133571 - 2015-01-27
did was make Hawkins eligible for the programs; it did not mandate his participation in them
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133571 - 2015-01-27
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, but only after she had first served two years of confinement. The circuit court and the parties did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132839 - 2017-09-21
, but only after she had first served two years of confinement. The circuit court and the parties did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132839 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
agree with appellate counsel that the existence of a prior ch. 51 proceeding did not preclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=215264 - 2018-07-11
agree with appellate counsel that the existence of a prior ch. 51 proceeding did not preclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=215264 - 2018-07-11
[PDF]
State v. Miguel F. Hirecheta
while he was confined at the Milwaukee County Criminal Justice Facility. He contends the evidence did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6740 - 2017-09-20
while he was confined at the Milwaukee County Criminal Justice Facility. He contends the evidence did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6740 - 2017-09-20