Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 41111 - 41120 of 57351 for id.
Search results 41111 - 41120 of 57351 for id.
COURT OF APPEALS
, and the community. See id. “When the exercise of discretion has been demonstrated, we follow a consistent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70794 - 2011-09-12
, and the community. See id. “When the exercise of discretion has been demonstrated, we follow a consistent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70794 - 2011-09-12
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of other factors concerning the defendant, the offense, and the community. See id. The trial court has
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=140099 - 2017-09-21
of other factors concerning the defendant, the offense, and the community. See id. The trial court has
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=140099 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that his postconviction counsel was ineffective by failing to raise that argument. See id., ¶36-47, 58
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=157290 - 2017-09-21
that his postconviction counsel was ineffective by failing to raise that argument. See id., ¶36-47, 58
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=157290 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
challenge to the court’s competency to act during the continuance. Id. There is no viable claim that S.H
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=204910 - 2017-12-13
challenge to the court’s competency to act during the continuance. Id. There is no viable claim that S.H
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=204910 - 2017-12-13
[PDF]
State v. Gerald W. Knudtson
, voluntarily and intelligently entered creates a manifest injustice. See id. Nos. 96-1739-CRNM & 96
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10978 - 2017-09-19
, voluntarily and intelligently entered creates a manifest injustice. See id. Nos. 96-1739-CRNM & 96
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10978 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
of a “sufficient reason” why the claims were not raised earlier. Id., 185 Wis. 2d at 181-82. ¶10 Whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32128 - 2014-09-15
of a “sufficient reason” why the claims were not raised earlier. Id., 185 Wis. 2d at 181-82. ¶10 Whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32128 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Jennifer V.
; there is only a constitutional right to an impartial jury." Id. (citing Ross v. Oklahoma, 487 U.S. 81, 85, 88
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9900 - 2017-09-19
; there is only a constitutional right to an impartial jury." Id. (citing Ross v. Oklahoma, 487 U.S. 81, 85, 88
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9900 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
or to point them to the proper substantive law. Id. An issue inadequately briefed on appeal may be deemed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=246148 - 2019-09-04
or to point them to the proper substantive law. Id. An issue inadequately briefed on appeal may be deemed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=246148 - 2019-09-04
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
No. 2020AP1691-CRNM 5 confidence in the outcome.’” Id. (citation omitted). In assessing prejudice, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=571943 - 2022-10-04
No. 2020AP1691-CRNM 5 confidence in the outcome.’” Id. (citation omitted). In assessing prejudice, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=571943 - 2022-10-04
COURT OF APPEALS
if there is some reasonable basis for the trial court’s determination. Id. ¶5 To the extent Willingham
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52742 - 2010-08-03
if there is some reasonable basis for the trial court’s determination. Id. ¶5 To the extent Willingham
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52742 - 2010-08-03