Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 41121 - 41130 of 59063 for quit claim deed.
Search results 41121 - 41130 of 59063 for quit claim deed.
2007 WI APP 254
of interest did not exist between Benelli and Moe and, therefore, Moe’s complaint fails to state a claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31009 - 2007-12-18
of interest did not exist between Benelli and Moe and, therefore, Moe’s complaint fails to state a claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31009 - 2007-12-18
Frederick Lee Pharm v. Byran Bartow
) seeking to “open judgment,” claiming that his Wis. Stat. ch. 980 commitment violated the Uniform Criminal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19706 - 2005-10-27
) seeking to “open judgment,” claiming that his Wis. Stat. ch. 980 commitment violated the Uniform Criminal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19706 - 2005-10-27
The Estate of Martha Burgess v. Carl Peterson
Burgess and Gerald Larson (the estate) appeal a judgment dismissing their claims against the personal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8282 - 2005-03-31
Burgess and Gerald Larson (the estate) appeal a judgment dismissing their claims against the personal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8282 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
to the Hammond Spur gas station in Superior. Ecklund claimed the original plan was for Hollenbeck to drop him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102152 - 2013-09-23
to the Hammond Spur gas station in Superior. Ecklund claimed the original plan was for Hollenbeck to drop him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102152 - 2013-09-23
State v. Julie Ann Quinn
to raise this claim on appeal. Section 901.03(1)(a), Stats.; Caccitolo v. State, 69 Wis.2d 102, 113, 230
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13629 - 2005-03-31
to raise this claim on appeal. Section 901.03(1)(a), Stats.; Caccitolo v. State, 69 Wis.2d 102, 113, 230
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13629 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI APP 204
to enforce his claim or that the contract was unenforceable or void as against public policy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29848 - 2014-09-15
to enforce his claim or that the contract was unenforceable or void as against public policy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29848 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
was entitled to governmental immunity under Wis. Stat. § 893.80(4).[2] He also asserted the Holmans’ claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106646 - 2014-01-13
was entitled to governmental immunity under Wis. Stat. § 893.80(4).[2] He also asserted the Holmans’ claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106646 - 2014-01-13
COURT OF APPEALS
also alleged the denial amounted to a regulatory taking, a claim he has since abandoned.[3] Pursuant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134831 - 2015-02-09
also alleged the denial amounted to a regulatory taking, a claim he has since abandoned.[3] Pursuant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134831 - 2015-02-09
COURT OF APPEALS
v. Patricia A.P., 195 Wis. 2d 855, 862, 537 N.W.2d 47 (Ct. App. 1995). ¶12 A claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31016 - 2007-12-03
v. Patricia A.P., 195 Wis. 2d 855, 862, 537 N.W.2d 47 (Ct. App. 1995). ¶12 A claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31016 - 2007-12-03
Theodore Craig v. City of Beloit
) How presented. (a) Every defense, in law or fact, except the defense of improper venue, to a claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5715 - 2005-03-31
) How presented. (a) Every defense, in law or fact, except the defense of improper venue, to a claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5715 - 2005-03-31