Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 41131 - 41140 of 59075 for quit claim deed.

2007 WI APP 204
, the court never ruled that Stayart lacked standing to enforce his claim or that the contract
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29848 - 2007-09-25

[PDF] Gustave Jeffrey Totsky v. Riteway Bus Service, Inc.
., A WISCONSIN CORPORATION AND QUAD/MED CLAIMS, QUAD/GRAPHICS, INC., DEFENDANTS, MAXICARE HEALTH
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12121 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] NOTICE
provided by the police reports, the State contended that the information that Smith now claimed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=41513 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] CA Blank Order
claim that trial counsel was ineffective for stipulating to a legally problematic restitution amount
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=827235 - 2024-07-17

COURT OF APPEALS
also alleged the denial amounted to a regulatory taking, a claim he has since abandoned.[3] Pursuant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134831 - 2015-02-09

[PDF] State v. Wallace I. Stenzel
.” Finally, he claims that the sentence imposed was No. 03-2974-CR 7 unduly harsh
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7023 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] NOTICE
offender. He also appeals a No. 2006AP1411-CR 2 postconviction order denying his claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29876 - 2014-09-15

WI App 12 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2008AP880-CR Complete Title ...
. §§ 961.41(1m)(cm)4. and 939.05. Artic claims the trial court erred in denying his suppression motion, seeks
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34787 - 2009-01-27

State v. Kenneth Dwight Spaulding
motion for postconviction relief. He asserts three claims of trial-court error: 1) that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16322 - 2005-03-31

State v. Kenneth Dwight Spaulding
motion for postconviction relief. He asserts three claims of trial-court error: 1) that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16321 - 2005-03-31