Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 41141 - 41150 of 68235 for law.

COURT OF APPEALS
and application of a statute to undisputed facts presents a question of law subject to de novo review. McNeil v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=117398 - 2014-07-21

[PDF] WI APP 118
was submitted on the briefs of John L. Sesini of Grzeca Law Group, S.C., Milwaukee. Respondent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=51813 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
. Stat. § 968.07(1)(a) (person may be arrested when a law enforcement officer has a warrant commanding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50002 - 2010-05-17

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. reported a burglary at their home. Law enforcement came to suspect Osowski as the perpetrator and made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=581670 - 2022-10-26

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED August 14, 2012 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court of App...
standard of law to reach a reasonable decision. Industrial Roofing Servs., 299 Wis. 2d 81, ¶41. ¶13
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86080 - 2012-08-13

[PDF] Steven C. Lamphier v. Ronald Ferber
experience with at least three wells. Lamphier was visiting the Undahls—Elroy is his father-in-law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18594 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Stella M. v. Daniel T.-W.
for the issuance of a child abuse injunction is a mixed question of fact and law. M.Q. v. Z.Q., 152 Wis.2d 701
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11914 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 27, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
“A [trial] court’s ruling on a motion to suppress evidence presents a mixed question of fact and law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27555 - 2006-12-26

State v. Jessie Redmond
the statutes regarding postconviction and appellate procedures. Statutory interpretation is a question of law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7916 - 2005-03-31

Heyde Companies, Inc. v. Dove Healthcare, LLC
they are clearly erroneous. See Wis. Stat. § 805.17(2). Conclusions of law will be reviewed independently
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3787 - 2005-03-31