Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 41151 - 41160 of 57351 for id.
Search results 41151 - 41160 of 57351 for id.
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 21, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
factors, and to exercise its discretion in imposing a reasoned and reasonable sentence. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27189 - 2006-11-20
factors, and to exercise its discretion in imposing a reasoned and reasonable sentence. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27189 - 2006-11-20
Mercy Health System Corporation v. Russell Wayne Gauss
). The doctrine of necessaries is particularly appropriate in cases dealing with medical care. Id. at 108. ¶9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4365 - 2005-03-31
). The doctrine of necessaries is particularly appropriate in cases dealing with medical care. Id. at 108. ¶9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4365 - 2005-03-31
David J. Smith v. Herrling
dismissed all of the claims. See id., slip op. at 2. On appeal, the Seventh Circuit noted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11227 - 2005-03-31
dismissed all of the claims. See id., slip op. at 2. On appeal, the Seventh Circuit noted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11227 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
by our supreme court. Id. ¶11 Nevertheless, the circuit court relied on Camp v. Anderson, 2006 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32731 - 2014-09-15
by our supreme court. Id. ¶11 Nevertheless, the circuit court relied on Camp v. Anderson, 2006 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32731 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Mark Hughes v. Stephen Puckett
filing fee provisions inapplicable. Id. at ¶16. ¶7 We agree with Hughes and Puckett that our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5313 - 2017-09-19
filing fee provisions inapplicable. Id. at ¶16. ¶7 We agree with Hughes and Puckett that our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5313 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
prong was satisfied. Id. at 697. ¶9 An ineffective assistance of counsel claim is a mixed question
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=60101 - 2014-09-15
prong was satisfied. Id. at 697. ¶9 An ineffective assistance of counsel claim is a mixed question
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=60101 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 19, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
which would support the circuit court’s decision.” Id. ¶7 Jeremy first argues the Department
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27460 - 2006-12-18
which would support the circuit court’s decision.” Id. ¶7 Jeremy first argues the Department
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27460 - 2006-12-18
COURT OF APPEALS
that the evidence sought by the Averys would result in a different outcome at trial. See id. at 320-21. ¶7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50733 - 2010-06-07
that the evidence sought by the Averys would result in a different outcome at trial. See id. at 320-21. ¶7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50733 - 2010-06-07
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and placement order will not be disturbed unless clearly erroneous.” Id. “However, whether a substantial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=242477 - 2019-06-20
and placement order will not be disturbed unless clearly erroneous.” Id. “However, whether a substantial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=242477 - 2019-06-20
[PDF]
State v. Mario M. Martinez
amount of restitution was “not a factor utilized in passing sentence,” id., Martinez was not denied due
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2751 - 2017-09-19
amount of restitution was “not a factor utilized in passing sentence,” id., Martinez was not denied due
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2751 - 2017-09-19