Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 41161 - 41170 of 68502 for did.
Search results 41161 - 41170 of 68502 for did.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
deposition, Gene testified to having a conversation with Baratka, but he did not say he told Baratka
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=147653 - 2017-09-21
deposition, Gene testified to having a conversation with Baratka, but he did not say he told Baratka
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=147653 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
, Williams objected to one of the prior convictions listed in the presentence investigation report, but did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31475 - 2014-09-15
, Williams objected to one of the prior convictions listed in the presentence investigation report, but did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31475 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Thomas M. Crider
testified that he did not request a continuance because he believed the additional information could
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3961 - 2017-09-20
testified that he did not request a continuance because he believed the additional information could
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3961 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
for armed burglary was reduced from class B to class E, 2001 Wis. Act 109, § 722, that change did
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=269601 - 2020-07-15
for armed burglary was reduced from class B to class E, 2001 Wis. Act 109, § 722, that change did
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=269601 - 2020-07-15
[PDF]
John O. Norquist v. Cate Zeuske
: PROSSER, J., did not participate. 2 ATTORNEYS: For the plaintiffs-appellants
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17439 - 2017-09-21
: PROSSER, J., did not participate. 2 ATTORNEYS: For the plaintiffs-appellants
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17439 - 2017-09-21
John O. Norquist v. Cate Zeuske
. LaRocque Justices: Concurred: Dissented: Not Participating: PROSSER, J., did
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17439 - 2005-03-31
. LaRocque Justices: Concurred: Dissented: Not Participating: PROSSER, J., did
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17439 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
as a condition of probation. Ellis did not appeal or file any postconviction motions. ¶3 Nearly twenty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70281 - 2011-08-29
as a condition of probation. Ellis did not appeal or file any postconviction motions. ¶3 Nearly twenty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70281 - 2011-08-29
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, did not consider improper factors, and reached a reasonable result. There is no arguable merit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=922348 - 2025-03-06
, did not consider improper factors, and reached a reasonable result. There is no arguable merit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=922348 - 2025-03-06
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, did not consider improper factors, and reached a reasonable result. There is no arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=922348 - 2025-03-06
, did not consider improper factors, and reached a reasonable result. There is no arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=922348 - 2025-03-06
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
as a condition of probation. Ellis did not appeal or file any postconviction motions. ¶3 Nearly twenty years
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=70281 - 2014-09-15
as a condition of probation. Ellis did not appeal or file any postconviction motions. ¶3 Nearly twenty years
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=70281 - 2014-09-15