Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 41161 - 41170 of 84004 for simple case search.
Search results 41161 - 41170 of 84004 for simple case search.
State v. Charles R. Seibel
of the circuit court. ¶2 The sole issue in this case is whether the trial court properly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6857 - 2005-03-31
of the circuit court. ¶2 The sole issue in this case is whether the trial court properly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6857 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
nevertheless recognize an action to quiet title in a pet because of the following statement in a case from 1899
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101402 - 2013-08-28
nevertheless recognize an action to quiet title in a pet because of the following statement in a case from 1899
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101402 - 2013-08-28
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
determined that a comparable sales approach could be employed in the case and that such sales supported
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=215861 - 2018-07-25
determined that a comparable sales approach could be employed in the case and that such sales supported
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=215861 - 2018-07-25
COURT OF APPEALS
because it made a note of the terms of the plea bargain in the case file and specifically recalled reading
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35337 - 2015-08-26
because it made a note of the terms of the plea bargain in the case file and specifically recalled reading
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35337 - 2015-08-26
COURT OF APPEALS
address the merits of the case, we note that State Farm has challenged the timeliness of the appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28936 - 2007-05-07
address the merits of the case, we note that State Farm has challenged the timeliness of the appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28936 - 2007-05-07
COURT OF APPEALS
) (citing DePratt, 113 Wis. 2d at 311). In the present case, only the second factor, identity between
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45687 - 2010-01-11
) (citing DePratt, 113 Wis. 2d at 311). In the present case, only the second factor, identity between
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45687 - 2010-01-11
CA Blank Order
cases, Valerie H. appeals from orders terminating her parental rights to two children. Valerie’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107601 - 2014-02-04
cases, Valerie H. appeals from orders terminating her parental rights to two children. Valerie’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107601 - 2014-02-04
COURT OF APPEALS
no duty either to defend or to indemnify Vagenius. We agree with the circuit court that this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=78237 - 2014-05-20
no duty either to defend or to indemnify Vagenius. We agree with the circuit court that this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=78237 - 2014-05-20
Elmer W. Glaeske v. Elwyn M. Shaw
2003 WI App 71 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 01-3056 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4595 - 2005-03-31
2003 WI App 71 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 01-3056 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4595 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Steven A. Harvey
2006 WI APP 26 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2005AP103-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21574 - 2017-09-21
2006 WI APP 26 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2005AP103-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21574 - 2017-09-21