Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 41181 - 41190 of 58492 for speedy trial.
Search results 41181 - 41190 of 58492 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
State v. James A. Lanzel
. On the final day of trial, testimony ended at 7:43 p.m. Lanzel requested that the court allow the jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11683 - 2017-09-19
. On the final day of trial, testimony ended at 7:43 p.m. Lanzel requested that the court allow the jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11683 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and whether there are any grounds to move for a new trial. The report notes the appropriate standard
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=207458 - 2018-01-24
and whether there are any grounds to move for a new trial. The report notes the appropriate standard
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=207458 - 2018-01-24
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
merit relating to pretrial or trial proceedings, we conclude based on our independent review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=858345 - 2024-10-10
merit relating to pretrial or trial proceedings, we conclude based on our independent review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=858345 - 2024-10-10
State v. James A. Lanzel
. On the final day of trial, testimony ended at 7:43 p.m. Lanzel requested that the court allow the jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11683 - 2005-03-31
. On the final day of trial, testimony ended at 7:43 p.m. Lanzel requested that the court allow the jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11683 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
. ¶5 Property division is committed to the trial court’s discretion. Scheuer v. Scheuer, 2006 WI App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28423 - 2014-09-15
. ¶5 Property division is committed to the trial court’s discretion. Scheuer v. Scheuer, 2006 WI App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28423 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Jeffrey S. Freeman
the error in the context of the entire trial and consider the strength of untainted evidence.” Id. ¶3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5077 - 2017-09-19
the error in the context of the entire trial and consider the strength of untainted evidence.” Id. ¶3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5077 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
at trial is direct or circumstantial. Id. at 503. Indeed, “circumstantial evidence is oftentimes stronger
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63154 - 2011-04-25
at trial is direct or circumstantial. Id. at 503. Indeed, “circumstantial evidence is oftentimes stronger
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63154 - 2011-04-25
COURT OF APPEALS
under the “rule of completeness.” We conclude the trial court properly excluded the subsequent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36833 - 2009-06-22
under the “rule of completeness.” We conclude the trial court properly excluded the subsequent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36833 - 2009-06-22
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
trial does not reveal any issues with arguable merit relating to the jury selection, evidentiary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=250769 - 2019-12-04
trial does not reveal any issues with arguable merit relating to the jury selection, evidentiary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=250769 - 2019-12-04
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
on grounds that “trial counsel told the defendant that the defendant would receive no greater period
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=504495 - 2022-04-07
on grounds that “trial counsel told the defendant that the defendant would receive no greater period
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=504495 - 2022-04-07