Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4121 - 4130 of 63537 for records.
Search results 4121 - 4130 of 63537 for records.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
no-merit report. After reviewing the record, counsel’s reports, and Rawls’ response, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=245255 - 2019-08-21
no-merit report. After reviewing the record, counsel’s reports, and Rawls’ response, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=245255 - 2019-08-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
2 the record and counsel’s report, we conclude that there are no issues with arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=176513 - 2017-09-21
2 the record and counsel’s report, we conclude that there are no issues with arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=176513 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=158421 - 2017-09-21
. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=158421 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
2 reviewing the record and counsel’s report, we conclude that there are no issues with arguable
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94809 - 2014-09-15
2 reviewing the record and counsel’s report, we conclude that there are no issues with arguable
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94809 - 2014-09-15
State v. Babette Davis
must show some unreasonable or unjustifiable basis in the record for the sentence imposed. The trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9236 - 2005-03-31
must show some unreasonable or unjustifiable basis in the record for the sentence imposed. The trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9236 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
no-merit report per this court’s order.[2] After reviewing the record and counsel’s reports, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110218 - 2014-04-15
no-merit report per this court’s order.[2] After reviewing the record and counsel’s reports, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110218 - 2014-04-15
State v. Isiah Washington
, and after conducting an independent review of the record, we conclude that there is no arguable merit to any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12486 - 2005-03-31
, and after conducting an independent review of the record, we conclude that there is no arguable merit to any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12486 - 2005-03-31
State v. James Arnold
of the victim’s counseling records prior to sentencing. Because we conclude that the trial court did not err, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6723 - 2005-03-31
of the victim’s counseling records prior to sentencing. Because we conclude that the trial court did not err, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6723 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95873 - 2014-09-15
. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95873 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. No. 2018AP1614-CRNM 2
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=256179 - 2020-03-17
. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. No. 2018AP1614-CRNM 2
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=256179 - 2020-03-17