Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4121 - 4130 of 63537 for records.
Search results 4121 - 4130 of 63537 for records.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
no-merit report. After reviewing the record, counsel’s reports, and Rawls’ response, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=245255 - 2019-08-21
no-merit report. After reviewing the record, counsel’s reports, and Rawls’ response, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=245255 - 2019-08-21
CA Blank Order
no-merit report per this court’s order.[2] After reviewing the record and counsel’s reports, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110218 - 2014-04-15
no-merit report per this court’s order.[2] After reviewing the record and counsel’s reports, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110218 - 2014-04-15
State v. Isiah Washington
, and after conducting an independent review of the record, we conclude that there is no arguable merit to any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12486 - 2005-03-31
, and after conducting an independent review of the record, we conclude that there is no arguable merit to any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12486 - 2005-03-31
State v. James Arnold
of the victim’s counseling records prior to sentencing. Because we conclude that the trial court did not err, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6723 - 2005-03-31
of the victim’s counseling records prior to sentencing. Because we conclude that the trial court did not err, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6723 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95873 - 2014-09-15
. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95873 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. David T.O.
he had no prior record and was receptive to future treatment. Both sides correctly state
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10741 - 2017-09-20
he had no prior record and was receptive to future treatment. Both sides correctly state
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10741 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the entire record, as well as the no-merit report, we agree with counsel’s assessment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=141507 - 2017-09-21
the entire record, as well as the no-merit report, we agree with counsel’s assessment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=141507 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
2 so. After reviewing the record and counsel’s report, we conclude that there are no issues
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=138594 - 2017-09-21
2 so. After reviewing the record and counsel’s report, we conclude that there are no issues
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=138594 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Babette Davis
some No. 95-1703-CR -3- unreasonable or unjustifiable basis in the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9236 - 2017-09-19
some No. 95-1703-CR -3- unreasonable or unjustifiable basis in the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9236 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. No. 2018AP1614-CRNM 2
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=256179 - 2020-03-17
. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. No. 2018AP1614-CRNM 2
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=256179 - 2020-03-17