Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4121 - 4130 of 63537 for records.
Search results 4121 - 4130 of 63537 for records.
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95873 - 2014-09-15
. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95873 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. David T.O.
he had no prior record and was receptive to future treatment. Both sides correctly state
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10741 - 2017-09-20
he had no prior record and was receptive to future treatment. Both sides correctly state
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10741 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the entire record, as well as the no-merit report, we agree with counsel’s assessment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=141507 - 2017-09-21
the entire record, as well as the no-merit report, we agree with counsel’s assessment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=141507 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
2 so. After reviewing the record and counsel’s report, we conclude that there are no issues
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=138594 - 2017-09-21
2 so. After reviewing the record and counsel’s report, we conclude that there are no issues
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=138594 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Babette Davis
some No. 95-1703-CR -3- unreasonable or unjustifiable basis in the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9236 - 2017-09-19
some No. 95-1703-CR -3- unreasonable or unjustifiable basis in the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9236 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. No. 2018AP1614-CRNM 2
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=256179 - 2020-03-17
. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. No. 2018AP1614-CRNM 2
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=256179 - 2020-03-17
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
a response, and has elected not to do so. After reviewing the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92070 - 2014-09-15
a response, and has elected not to do so. After reviewing the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92070 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a response. He has not done so. Upon consideration of the report and an independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=116148 - 2017-09-21
a response. He has not done so. Upon consideration of the report and an independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=116148 - 2017-09-21
State v. Timothy A. Hellman
will affirm a trial court’s sentencing decision if the record shows the trial court reached a logical decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2725 - 2005-03-31
will affirm a trial court’s sentencing decision if the record shows the trial court reached a logical decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2725 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
the reason on the record.” Section 973.20(1r). “Crime considered at sentencing” is defined as “any crime
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102338 - 2013-09-25
the reason on the record.” Section 973.20(1r). “Crime considered at sentencing” is defined as “any crime
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102338 - 2013-09-25