Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4121 - 4130 of 63537 for records.
Search results 4121 - 4130 of 63537 for records.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
2 so. After reviewing the record and counsel’s report, we conclude that there are no issues
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=138594 - 2017-09-21
2 so. After reviewing the record and counsel’s report, we conclude that there are no issues
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=138594 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Babette Davis
some No. 95-1703-CR -3- unreasonable or unjustifiable basis in the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9236 - 2017-09-19
some No. 95-1703-CR -3- unreasonable or unjustifiable basis in the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9236 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. No. 2018AP1614-CRNM 2
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=256179 - 2020-03-17
. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. No. 2018AP1614-CRNM 2
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=256179 - 2020-03-17
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
a response, and has elected not to do so. After reviewing the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92070 - 2014-09-15
a response, and has elected not to do so. After reviewing the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92070 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
the reason on the record.” Section 973.20(1r). “Crime considered at sentencing” is defined as “any crime
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102338 - 2013-09-25
the reason on the record.” Section 973.20(1r). “Crime considered at sentencing” is defined as “any crime
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102338 - 2013-09-25
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
not done so. Upon consideration of the no-merit report and an independent review of the record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=529853 - 2022-06-08
not done so. Upon consideration of the no-merit report and an independent review of the record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=529853 - 2022-06-08
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
not filed a response. Upon reviewing the entire record, as well as the no-merit report, we agree
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=147097 - 2017-09-21
not filed a response. Upon reviewing the entire record, as well as the no-merit report, we agree
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=147097 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Tony Shaw v. Gary R. McCaughtry
of the PRC is limited to the record created before the committee. See State ex rel. Whiting v. Kolb, 158
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14091 - 2014-09-15
of the PRC is limited to the record created before the committee. See State ex rel. Whiting v. Kolb, 158
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14091 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=847013 - 2024-09-11
review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=847013 - 2024-09-11
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the record, counsel’s reports, and Hess’ response, we conclude that there are no issues with arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=258752 - 2020-04-29
the record, counsel’s reports, and Hess’ response, we conclude that there are no issues with arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=258752 - 2020-04-29