Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4121 - 4130 of 63559 for records.
Search results 4121 - 4130 of 63559 for records.
[PDF]
Tony Shaw v. Gary R. McCaughtry
of the PRC is limited to the record created before the committee. See State ex rel. Whiting v. Kolb, 158
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14091 - 2014-09-15
of the PRC is limited to the record created before the committee. See State ex rel. Whiting v. Kolb, 158
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14091 - 2014-09-15
State v. Timothy A. Hellman
will affirm a trial court’s sentencing decision if the record shows the trial court reached a logical decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2725 - 2005-03-31
will affirm a trial court’s sentencing decision if the record shows the trial court reached a logical decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2725 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
no-merit report. After reviewing the record, counsel’s reports, and Rawls’ response, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=245255 - 2019-08-21
no-merit report. After reviewing the record, counsel’s reports, and Rawls’ response, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=245255 - 2019-08-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
not filed a response. Upon reviewing the entire record, as well as the no-merit report, we agree
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=147097 - 2017-09-21
not filed a response. Upon reviewing the entire record, as well as the no-merit report, we agree
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=147097 - 2017-09-21
State v. James Arnold
of the victim’s counseling records prior to sentencing. Because we conclude that the trial court did not err, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6723 - 2005-03-31
of the victim’s counseling records prior to sentencing. Because we conclude that the trial court did not err, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6723 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
Cynthia A. nor the guardian ad litem have filed briefs. We have, therefore, only the record on which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30796 - 2007-11-06
Cynthia A. nor the guardian ad litem have filed briefs. We have, therefore, only the record on which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30796 - 2007-11-06
CA Blank Order
reviewing the record and counsel’s reports, we conclude that there are no issues with arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109564 - 2014-04-01
reviewing the record and counsel’s reports, we conclude that there are no issues with arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109564 - 2014-04-01
[PDF]
State v. Babette Davis
some No. 95-1703-CR -3- unreasonable or unjustifiable basis in the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9236 - 2017-09-19
some No. 95-1703-CR -3- unreasonable or unjustifiable basis in the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9236 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
2 response. After reviewing the record, counsel’s report, and Dearing’s response, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=237640 - 2019-03-20
2 response. After reviewing the record, counsel’s report, and Dearing’s response, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=237640 - 2019-03-20
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95873 - 2014-09-15
. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95873 - 2014-09-15