Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4121 - 4130 of 6141 for sheriff.
Search results 4121 - 4130 of 6141 for sheriff.
State v. Gregory Johnson
presented a witness, Russel Cragin, an investigator with the Dunn County Sheriff’s Department, in support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13672 - 2005-03-31
presented a witness, Russel Cragin, an investigator with the Dunn County Sheriff’s Department, in support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13672 - 2005-03-31
JoAnne M.N. v. Eau Claire County Department of Human Services
or services.[3] The county sheriff personally served JoAnne with a summons, copy of the petition and notice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7543 - 2005-03-31
or services.[3] The county sheriff personally served JoAnne with a summons, copy of the petition and notice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7543 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. The charges resulted from a stop by a deputy with the Dodge County Sheriff’s office, Robbie Weinfurter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=241114 - 2019-05-23
. The charges resulted from a stop by a deputy with the Dodge County Sheriff’s office, Robbie Weinfurter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=241114 - 2019-05-23
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
were established through testimony by the deputy sheriff who conducted the stop. The officer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=647943 - 2023-04-27
were established through testimony by the deputy sheriff who conducted the stop. The officer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=647943 - 2023-04-27
[PDF]
State v. David L. Shaw
was not informed that the boards had been obtained by the sheriff until a few weeks before trial. At the hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10507 - 2017-09-20
was not informed that the boards had been obtained by the sheriff until a few weeks before trial. At the hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10507 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS
, it immediately fired the salesman and filed a complaint with the sheriff’s department. [3] The notice of appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28910 - 2007-05-08
, it immediately fired the salesman and filed a complaint with the sheriff’s department. [3] The notice of appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28910 - 2007-05-08
State v. James P. Sullivan
County sheriff’s deputy stopped Sullivan on the suspicion that he was OMVWI. The deputy administered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12789 - 2005-03-31
County sheriff’s deputy stopped Sullivan on the suspicion that he was OMVWI. The deputy administered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12789 - 2005-03-31
County of Dane v. Sherman C. Sporle
. BACKGROUND ¶3 A Dane County Deputy Sheriff arrested Sporle for OMVWI and transported
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4476 - 2005-03-31
. BACKGROUND ¶3 A Dane County Deputy Sheriff arrested Sporle for OMVWI and transported
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4476 - 2005-03-31
Dane County v. James P. Sullivan
County sheriff’s deputy stopped Sullivan on the suspicion that he was OMVWI. The deputy administered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12913 - 2005-03-31
County sheriff’s deputy stopped Sullivan on the suspicion that he was OMVWI. The deputy administered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12913 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the Outagamie County Sheriff’s Department began an undercover internet investigation. He determined
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=248716 - 2019-10-16
of the Outagamie County Sheriff’s Department began an undercover internet investigation. He determined
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=248716 - 2019-10-16