Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 41201 - 41210 of 69114 for he.
Search results 41201 - 41210 of 69114 for he.
[PDF]
State v. Darin L. Fogle
of burglary. He argues that the trial court erred when it denied his motion to suppress evidence seized
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5165 - 2017-09-19
of burglary. He argues that the trial court erred when it denied his motion to suppress evidence seized
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5165 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Jerry Chandler v. Larry Gapinski
quality. Gapinski testified that he understood that Chandler’s “top dollar figure” was $6,000
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12699 - 2017-09-21
quality. Gapinski testified that he understood that Chandler’s “top dollar figure” was $6,000
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12699 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, and absconded shortly thereafter. While an absconding parolee, he was charged with new sexual assault
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=223005 - 2018-10-16
, and absconded shortly thereafter. While an absconding parolee, he was charged with new sexual assault
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=223005 - 2018-10-16
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
finding. W.J.S. next argues that the circuit court failed to make a finding that he neglected, refused
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=162293 - 2017-09-21
finding. W.J.S. next argues that the circuit court failed to make a finding that he neglected, refused
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=162293 - 2017-09-21
State v. Timothy V. Montgomery
was ineffective for failing to argue that the charges against him were multiplicitous; and (3) he was denied his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20547 - 2005-12-12
was ineffective for failing to argue that the charges against him were multiplicitous; and (3) he was denied his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20547 - 2005-12-12
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. No. 2019AP211-CRNM 2 California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). He was advised of his right to file a response
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=244238 - 2019-07-31
. No. 2019AP211-CRNM 2 California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). He was advised of his right to file a response
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=244238 - 2019-07-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
or consecutive nature of his various sentences, one from another county. He sought certiorari review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=137979 - 2017-09-21
or consecutive nature of his various sentences, one from another county. He sought certiorari review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=137979 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
Hendrickson “failed to overcome” a status report from November 2009 showing that he was not in compliance
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105546 - 2017-09-21
Hendrickson “failed to overcome” a status report from November 2009 showing that he was not in compliance
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105546 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Romondo D. Seymour
for which he was convicted, when his sentence on three counts was reversed and No(s). 98-3233-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14773 - 2017-09-21
for which he was convicted, when his sentence on three counts was reversed and No(s). 98-3233-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14773 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
his motion for postconviction relief. He argues that the sentence the court imposed was unduly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34976 - 2014-09-15
his motion for postconviction relief. He argues that the sentence the court imposed was unduly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34976 - 2014-09-15