Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 41231 - 41240 of 46661 for adult name change.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
that “the additional claims do not materially change the [c]ourt’s analysis in [denying] the first motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=977261 - 2025-07-02

Joseph Wrecza v. Harold A. Patino
and 90% to Greengrass. The jury also changed the award of damages, increasing the amount awarded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14703 - 2005-03-31

Sharon Kabes v. The School District of River Falls
): it creates an absurd result. If § 118.24(3) is immutable, the District and Board could ignore or change
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6196 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Steven M. Shimek
for the defendant’s change of heart.’” Id. at 284, 592 N.W.2d at 227 (quoted source omitted). A circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15083 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Burley Harding
changed from a civil forfeiture to a criminal offense during the delay. In fact, it can be argued
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14153 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
inmates already in adjustment segregation did not cause such a major change in the physical conditions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132602 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Eugene Stern v. Wisconsin Department of Health and Family Services
. at 1347-48. The figures are derived from the percentage change in the CPI-AI since 1981 which can
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11290 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Richard Kleinke, Sr. v. Farmers Cooperative Supply & Shipping
claim based not on the effect of the incident itself, but on how their lives had changed since
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17000 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
“does not point to any change in law that has made him aware of a claim now that he was not aware
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=122799 - 2014-09-30

Karen M. v. Craig P.
. However, the court then changed its order. Because of Craig’s employer’s difficulty in withholding 17
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3680 - 2005-03-31