Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 41241 - 41250 of 63934 for records/1000.

[PDF] NOTICE
time, but she’s clearly employable.” This skepticism is supported by the record. The support order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=43847 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] CA Blank Order
motion for sentence modification. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=448141 - 2021-11-03

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
that, when the parties entered into the stipulation, Bradley stated on the record before a court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106463 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Roger A. Schultz
and made a new record, recommending the concurrent sentence bargained for. The court rejected
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15013 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Mary P. Donovan
. Even though the acquaintance had a criminal record, Attorney Donovan decided to send him through
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17279 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] NOTICE
a jury could reasonably conclude that the facts of record met the standard as it had been instructed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30830 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
Based on our review of the record, we conclude that he did. ¶6 Ahern’s motions and arguments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=72624 - 2014-09-15

SC Clerk-Ltr
-02 In the matter of amendment of Supreme Court Rule 72.01 regarding record retention. Issued April 1
/sc/stats/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54685 - 2010-09-16

COURT OF APPEALS
and conduct. On this record, the judge’s familiarity with the parties did not breed objective bias. ¶8
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94944 - 2013-04-09

COURT OF APPEALS
in the record for the sentence at issue. When reviewing a sentence imposed by the [trial] court, we start
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29623 - 2007-07-09