Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 41291 - 41300 of 68468 for did.
Search results 41291 - 41300 of 68468 for did.
COURT OF APPEALS
not to appraise lot three. In his deposition, Gene testified to having a conversation with Baratka, but he did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=147653 - 2015-08-30
not to appraise lot three. In his deposition, Gene testified to having a conversation with Baratka, but he did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=147653 - 2015-08-30
COURT OF APPEALS
of the prior convictions listed in the presentence investigation report, but did not deny that he had 187
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31475 - 2015-01-20
of the prior convictions listed in the presentence investigation report, but did not deny that he had 187
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31475 - 2015-01-20
CA Blank Order
residence, the motion must be denied because the police did not require a search warrant to arrest
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132446 - 2014-12-28
residence, the motion must be denied because the police did not require a search warrant to arrest
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132446 - 2014-12-28
COURT OF APPEALS
did not file a postconviction motion alleging ineffective assistance of trial counsel. Therefore, he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=136384 - 2015-03-02
did not file a postconviction motion alleging ineffective assistance of trial counsel. Therefore, he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=136384 - 2015-03-02
David R. Brown v. Gerald Berge
minimum due process requirements, the officer did an adequate investigation here. The officer's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10027 - 2005-03-31
minimum due process requirements, the officer did an adequate investigation here. The officer's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10027 - 2005-03-31
State v. John Casteel
firearm possession. Casteel did not file a timely appeal from the trial court order denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14220 - 2005-03-31
firearm possession. Casteel did not file a timely appeal from the trial court order denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14220 - 2005-03-31
State v. Stacey R. Piper
because he incorrectly assumed that Piper’s car did not have anti-lock brakes when he reconstructed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25277 - 2010-05-25
because he incorrectly assumed that Piper’s car did not have anti-lock brakes when he reconstructed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25277 - 2010-05-25
Joel Johnson v. Wisconsin Central Ltd.
of the order on April 15, 1994. Despite the omission in the signed order, Johnson did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8999 - 2005-03-31
of the order on April 15, 1994. Despite the omission in the signed order, Johnson did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8999 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
argued: (1) his trial lawyer should have sought dismissal based on the fact that the witnesses did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92401 - 2013-02-04
argued: (1) his trial lawyer should have sought dismissal based on the fact that the witnesses did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92401 - 2013-02-04
Mike Maes Construction, Inc. v. Francis Grady
] and that Grady was not an independent contractor because he did not meet all of the criteria under Wis. Stat
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16031 - 2005-03-31
] and that Grady was not an independent contractor because he did not meet all of the criteria under Wis. Stat
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16031 - 2005-03-31