Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 41291 - 41300 of 68466 for did.

[PDF] NOTICE
the defendant’s residence. We conclude it did not, and therefore we affirm. No. 2009AP1164-CR 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=58626 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Fred J. Collier, Jr.
him of criminal negligence. Collier's counsel did not wrongfully stipulate to the fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9656 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 8, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court of...
in this case. The court did not exercise its own judgment to determine what sanction should be imposed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28368 - 2007-03-07

[PDF] Johnny Lacy, Jr. v. Dan A. Buchler
to that offense. Lacy also claims that the committee did not act as an impartial administrative body because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7955 - 2017-09-19

Vanessa Henningfeld v. Judith Fischer
decedent intended to revoke his 1988 Will, the trial court recognized that he did not validly do so because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13000 - 2005-03-31

Penny L. Clauer v. Lafayette County
for sanctions against the County under § 814.025, Stats. WWLS did not pursue the sanctions issue any further
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13954 - 2005-03-31

Town of Grand Chute v. Mark Harry Gabriel
then, Gabriel did not attempt to reopen the trial for the admission of his testimony. Nor does the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12629 - 2005-03-31

State v. Dwayne E. Hudson
that the circuit court did not erroneously exercise discretion at Hudson’s sentencing, we affirm. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18444 - 2005-03-31

Mike Maes Construction, Inc. v. Francis Grady
] and that Grady was not an independent contractor because he did not meet all of the criteria under Wis. Stat
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16031 - 2007-05-31

State v. Michael Alan Williams
. The circuit court again denied the motion, and this time Williams did not appeal. ¶3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18076 - 2005-05-09