Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 41291 - 41300 of 59049 for quit claim deed.
Search results 41291 - 41300 of 59049 for quit claim deed.
State v. Brent L. Miller
vehicle while under the influence of an intoxicant (OMVWI). He claims the trial court erred in denying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15991 - 2005-03-31
vehicle while under the influence of an intoxicant (OMVWI). He claims the trial court erred in denying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15991 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Izell W.
WIS. STAT. § 938.538. See WIS. STAT. § 938.34(4h). ¶2 Izell W. claims that the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7028 - 2017-09-20
WIS. STAT. § 938.538. See WIS. STAT. § 938.34(4h). ¶2 Izell W. claims that the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7028 - 2017-09-20
CA Blank Order
, no arguable merit to a claim that the court erroneously exercised its sentencing discretion when imposing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104804 - 2013-11-25
, no arguable merit to a claim that the court erroneously exercised its sentencing discretion when imposing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104804 - 2013-11-25
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. This is very common.” Consequently, the State disputes Crosby’s claim that “[t]here was no evidence
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1059484 - 2026-01-13
. This is very common.” Consequently, the State disputes Crosby’s claim that “[t]here was no evidence
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1059484 - 2026-01-13
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. This is very common.” Consequently, the State disputes Crosby’s claim that “[t]here was no evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1059484 - 2026-01-13
. This is very common.” Consequently, the State disputes Crosby’s claim that “[t]here was no evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1059484 - 2026-01-13
COURT OF APPEALS
contends he had notice and an opportunity to rebut the City’s claims. The circuit court came to a similar
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59439 - 2011-01-31
contends he had notice and an opportunity to rebut the City’s claims. The circuit court came to a similar
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59439 - 2011-01-31
[PDF]
David Langreck v. Wisconsin Lawyers Mutual Insurance Company
the foreclosure action. WILMIC claims that Langreck should have argued that the Bank was not entitled to full
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14267 - 2014-09-15
the foreclosure action. WILMIC claims that Langreck should have argued that the Bank was not entitled to full
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14267 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Bronsteatter & Sons, Inc. v. American Growers Insurance Company
Bronsteatter argues the circuit court erred by concluding its claims were barred by the one-year statute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19126 - 2017-09-21
Bronsteatter argues the circuit court erred by concluding its claims were barred by the one-year statute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19126 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
in the no-merit report that there is no arguable merit to seeking plea withdrawal based on a claim that Moore’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=878648 - 2024-11-19
in the no-merit report that there is no arguable merit to seeking plea withdrawal based on a claim that Moore’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=878648 - 2024-11-19
State v. Alan D. Eisenberg
of traffic offenses. In Brown, the defendant claimed that he was speeding because of the law enforcement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3474 - 2005-03-31
of traffic offenses. In Brown, the defendant claimed that he was speeding because of the law enforcement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3474 - 2005-03-31