Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4131 - 4140 of 44675 for part.
Search results 4131 - 4140 of 44675 for part.
State v. Edward J. E.
that, during intercourse, Edward did not touch Heather with any part of his body except his penis. ¶9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5368 - 2005-03-31
that, during intercourse, Edward did not touch Heather with any part of his body except his penis. ¶9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5368 - 2005-03-31
2006 WI APP 224
. APPEAL from judgments of the circuit court for Iowa County: william d. dyke, Judge. Affirmed in part
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26933 - 2006-11-20
. APPEAL from judgments of the circuit court for Iowa County: william d. dyke, Judge. Affirmed in part
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26933 - 2006-11-20
[PDF]
Randal J. Hellenbrand v. Irwin A. Goodman
County: JOHN C. ALBERT, Judge. Affirmed in part; reversed in part and cause remanded with directions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4725 - 2017-09-19
County: JOHN C. ALBERT, Judge. Affirmed in part; reversed in part and cause remanded with directions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4725 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
WI APP 224
. DYKE, Judge. Affirmed in part; reversed in part and cause remanded with directions. Before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26933 - 2014-09-15
. DYKE, Judge. Affirmed in part; reversed in part and cause remanded with directions. Before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26933 - 2014-09-15
State v. Edward J. E.
that, during intercourse, Edward did not touch Heather with any part of his body except his penis. ¶9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5369 - 2005-03-31
that, during intercourse, Edward did not touch Heather with any part of his body except his penis. ¶9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5369 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI App 64
: RAYMOND S. HUBER, Judge. Affirmed in part and reversed in part. Before Lundsten, P.J., Blanchard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=219083 - 2019-01-10
: RAYMOND S. HUBER, Judge. Affirmed in part and reversed in part. Before Lundsten, P.J., Blanchard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=219083 - 2019-01-10
[PDF]
State v. Edward J. E.
intercourse, Edward did not touch Heather with any part of his body except his penis. ¶9 One dispute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5368 - 2017-09-19
intercourse, Edward did not touch Heather with any part of his body except his penis. ¶9 One dispute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5368 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Edward J. E.
intercourse, Edward did not touch Heather with any part of his body except his penis. ¶9 One dispute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5369 - 2017-09-19
intercourse, Edward did not touch Heather with any part of his body except his penis. ¶9 One dispute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5369 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
major point pursued by trial counsel involved the street surveillance camera videos showing part
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1024278 - 2025-10-16
major point pursued by trial counsel involved the street surveillance camera videos showing part
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1024278 - 2025-10-16
[PDF]
) assigned all of Kelly’s student loan debt solely to her as part of the property division; (3) denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1040736 - 2025-11-20
) assigned all of Kelly’s student loan debt solely to her as part of the property division; (3) denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1040736 - 2025-11-20