Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4131 - 4140 of 63511 for records.
Search results 4131 - 4140 of 63511 for records.
[PDF]
State v. Peter R. Burgeson
sentence that he was serving. Because the record as a whole demonstrates that the sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13136 - 2017-09-21
sentence that he was serving. Because the record as a whole demonstrates that the sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13136 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
a response, and has elected not to do so. After reviewing the record and counsel’s report, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99690 - 2013-07-23
a response, and has elected not to do so. After reviewing the record and counsel’s report, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99690 - 2013-07-23
CA Blank Order
no-merit report per this court’s order.[2] After reviewing the record and counsel’s reports, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110218 - 2014-04-15
no-merit report per this court’s order.[2] After reviewing the record and counsel’s reports, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110218 - 2014-04-15
State v. Timothy A. Hellman
will affirm a trial court’s sentencing decision if the record shows the trial court reached a logical decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2725 - 2005-03-31
will affirm a trial court’s sentencing decision if the record shows the trial court reached a logical decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2725 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. No. 2018AP1614-CRNM 2
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=256179 - 2020-03-17
. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. No. 2018AP1614-CRNM 2
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=256179 - 2020-03-17
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
2 record, counsel’s report, and Myers’ response, we conclude that there are no issues
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=121953 - 2014-09-24
2 record, counsel’s report, and Myers’ response, we conclude that there are no issues
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=121953 - 2014-09-24
CA Blank Order
reviewing the record and counsel’s reports, we conclude that there are no issues with arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109564 - 2014-04-01
reviewing the record and counsel’s reports, we conclude that there are no issues with arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109564 - 2014-04-01
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
not done so. Upon consideration of the no-merit report and an independent review of the record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=529853 - 2022-06-08
not done so. Upon consideration of the no-merit report and an independent review of the record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=529853 - 2022-06-08
COURT OF APPEALS
Cynthia A. nor the guardian ad litem have filed briefs. We have, therefore, only the record on which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30796 - 2007-11-06
Cynthia A. nor the guardian ad litem have filed briefs. We have, therefore, only the record on which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30796 - 2007-11-06
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
independent review of the record, we conclude there is no arguable merit to any issue that could be raised
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=319544 - 2020-12-30
independent review of the record, we conclude there is no arguable merit to any issue that could be raised
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=319544 - 2020-12-30