Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 41301 - 41310 of 68485 for did.
Search results 41301 - 41310 of 68485 for did.
COURT OF APPEALS
argued: (1) his trial lawyer should have sought dismissal based on the fact that the witnesses did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92401 - 2013-02-04
argued: (1) his trial lawyer should have sought dismissal based on the fact that the witnesses did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92401 - 2013-02-04
State v. Jesse R.J.
the order. Jesse renews his argument that the juvenile court did not meet the good
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12283 - 2005-03-31
the order. Jesse renews his argument that the juvenile court did not meet the good
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12283 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
alteration of the form misrepresented any fact. Boone’s use of the form may have been a misuse, but he did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108715 - 2014-03-05
alteration of the form misrepresented any fact. Boone’s use of the form may have been a misuse, but he did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108715 - 2014-03-05
National Exchange Bank & Trust v. Southside Tire Co., Inc.
and sued Southside for $5,000 in damages for “reduced collateral,” alleging that Southside did not have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5118 - 2005-05-15
and sued Southside for $5,000 in damages for “reduced collateral,” alleging that Southside did not have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5118 - 2005-05-15
State v. Julian D. Pope
this appeal from the trial court’s ruling that the police entry did not violate the knock and announce rule
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14925 - 2006-11-20
this appeal from the trial court’s ruling that the police entry did not violate the knock and announce rule
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14925 - 2006-11-20
COURT OF APPEALS
should accept the court’s finding that his attorney did not have a strategic reason. However
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35444 - 2009-02-04
should accept the court’s finding that his attorney did not have a strategic reason. However
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35444 - 2009-02-04
CA Blank Order
the bifurcated sentences did not exceed the maximum allowed by Wis. Stat. § 973.01. The confinement portion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133449 - 2015-01-26
the bifurcated sentences did not exceed the maximum allowed by Wis. Stat. § 973.01. The confinement portion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133449 - 2015-01-26
Racine County Human Services Department v. Olivia G.
court did not find Ridgewood to be the least restrictive setting—that a facility similar to one located
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6546 - 2005-03-31
court did not find Ridgewood to be the least restrictive setting—that a facility similar to one located
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6546 - 2005-03-31
Karl Melnik v. Matthew Mikolic
described the property as a 120 acre parcel, as did the Wisconsin Real Estate Transfer Return. Mikolic’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6908 - 2005-03-31
described the property as a 120 acre parcel, as did the Wisconsin Real Estate Transfer Return. Mikolic’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6908 - 2005-03-31
State v. William G. Campbell
, did not constitute multiple punishments, and did not violate the Double Jeopardy Clause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10664 - 2005-03-31
, did not constitute multiple punishments, and did not violate the Double Jeopardy Clause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10664 - 2005-03-31