Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 41341 - 41350 of 69325 for as he.
Search results 41341 - 41350 of 69325 for as he.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
claiming he was entitled to a new trial based on newly discovered evidence and ineffective assistance
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=114652 - 2017-09-21
claiming he was entitled to a new trial based on newly discovered evidence and ineffective assistance
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=114652 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Darin L. Fogle
of burglary. He argues that the trial court erred when it denied his motion to suppress evidence seized
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5165 - 2017-09-19
of burglary. He argues that the trial court erred when it denied his motion to suppress evidence seized
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5165 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Jerry Chandler v. Larry Gapinski
quality. Gapinski testified that he understood that Chandler’s “top dollar figure” was $6,000
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12699 - 2017-09-21
quality. Gapinski testified that he understood that Chandler’s “top dollar figure” was $6,000
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12699 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, and absconded shortly thereafter. While an absconding parolee, he was charged with new sexual assault
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=223005 - 2018-10-16
, and absconded shortly thereafter. While an absconding parolee, he was charged with new sexual assault
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=223005 - 2018-10-16
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. No. 2019AP211-CRNM 2 California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). He was advised of his right to file a response
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=244238 - 2019-07-31
. No. 2019AP211-CRNM 2 California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). He was advised of his right to file a response
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=244238 - 2019-07-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
or consecutive nature of his various sentences, one from another county. He sought certiorari review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=137979 - 2017-09-21
or consecutive nature of his various sentences, one from another county. He sought certiorari review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=137979 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
Hendrickson “failed to overcome” a status report from November 2009 showing that he was not in compliance
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105546 - 2017-09-21
Hendrickson “failed to overcome” a status report from November 2009 showing that he was not in compliance
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105546 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
. ¶4 Hong contends that the judgment should be reopened because he was not represented by an attorney
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26989 - 2014-09-15
. ¶4 Hong contends that the judgment should be reopened because he was not represented by an attorney
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26989 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
denying his motion to modify sentence. He alleges the existence of a new factor. Based upon our review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=800595 - 2024-05-15
denying his motion to modify sentence. He alleges the existence of a new factor. Based upon our review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=800595 - 2024-05-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
then and it should be okay now because he has a track record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44902 - 2014-09-15
then and it should be okay now because he has a track record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44902 - 2014-09-15