Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4141 - 4150 of 63679 for Motion for joint custody.

[PDF] Oral Argument Synopses - April 2012
with child custody. The Supreme Court is asked to review the Court of Appeals’ decision in State v. Bowden
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=80943 - 2014-09-15

State v. Rickey V. Gray
to comply with attempt to take a person into custody, (2) resisting an officer, (3) disorderly conduct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5459 - 2005-03-31

CA Blank Order
charge caused him to be in custody on a hold. [5] Gould’s sentence credit motion was dated June 12
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109997 - 2014-04-08

[PDF] State v. Cornelius R. Reed
-2000).1 He also appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion. Reed claims: (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4561 - 2017-09-20

COURT OF APPEALS
that he was in custody at the time he made the inconsistent statements. Therefore, the motion, on its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103739 - 2013-11-04

Skycom, Inc. v. Town of Elba Town Board
., appeals from an order denying its “motion for relief from judgment” and motion to amend its complaint
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3356 - 2005-03-31

Janet Caspers v. Bruce D. Baikie
1, 2001. Pursuant to the agreement, Caspers was granted sole legal custody and primary physical
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5180 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
follows. On appeal, Padgett contends that the circuit court should have granted his motion to suppress
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=240961 - 2019-05-22

[PDF] Janet Caspers v. Bruce D. Baikie
into a custodial account for the child’s college expenses. ¶3 On April 5, 2001, Baikie filed a motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5180 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
if the defendant is no longer in custody in connection with the conviction challenged in the motion. Jessen v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=172704 - 2017-09-21