Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4141 - 4150 of 6659 for mix.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
.2d 838. We review an ineffective assistance of counsel claim using a mixed standard of review. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1013916 - 2025-09-24

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
presents a mixed question of fact and law. Id., ¶10. This court upholds the circuit court’s findings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=904184 - 2025-01-22

State v. Dujuan T. Nash
this claim involves a mixed question of law and fact. State v. Johnson, 153 Wis. 2d 121, 127, 449 N.W.2d 845
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4392 - 2005-03-31

State v. Robert Bintz
-inculpatory statements are generally reliable, the Court noted one of the most effective ways to lie is to mix
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4454 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Gregory R. Bloom
there is none. A good attorney can attempt to mix up everything for the jury to have them find, well
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6575 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Yolanda L.
of counsel claims present mixed questions of fact and law. State v. Pitsch, 124 Wis. 2d 628, 633-34, 369
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5808 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] CA Blank Order
is subject to a mixed standard of review. State v. Allen, 2004 WI 106, ¶9, 274 Wis. 2d 568, 682 N.W.2d 433
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101375 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
preclusion is consistent with fundamental fairness is a mixed question of law and fact subject to both de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=77687 - 2012-02-07

Main Street Partners v. Kathleen Kaminski
in relation thereto.” Id. Whether the parties’ actions constituted a novation is a mixed question of fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11233 - 2005-03-31

Brian E. Davis v. Nationsbank, N.A.
involve a mixed question of law and fact. Id. The determination of what a party or attorney “knew
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2388 - 2005-03-31