Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4141 - 4150 of 12799 for se.
Search results 4141 - 4150 of 12799 for se.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
pro se from an order denying his postconviction motions for relief. Based upon our review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=204946 - 2017-12-13
pro se from an order denying his postconviction motions for relief. Based upon our review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=204946 - 2017-12-13
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and Brennan, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Ronald Schroeder, pro se, appeals an order denying his motion to modify
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=83969 - 2014-09-15
and Brennan, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Ronald Schroeder, pro se, appeals an order denying his motion to modify
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=83969 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. #2006CF1145) Before Lundsten, Higginbotham and Sherman, JJ. Sean Edge, pro se, appeals an order
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109620 - 2017-09-21
. #2006CF1145) Before Lundsten, Higginbotham and Sherman, JJ. Sean Edge, pro se, appeals an order
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109620 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Supreme Court of Wisconsin
or the administration of justice or except when acting pro se in a matter involving the judge or the judge’s interests
/sc/judcond/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=74794 - 2014-09-15
or the administration of justice or except when acting pro se in a matter involving the judge or the judge’s interests
/sc/judcond/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=74794 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
appeals pro se from orders denying his motions for contempt, clarification, and sentence modification
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=223005 - 2018-10-16
appeals pro se from orders denying his motions for contempt, clarification, and sentence modification
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=223005 - 2018-10-16
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Curley, P.J., Brennan and Bradley, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. David L. Gray, pro se, appeals an order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=150601 - 2017-09-21
Curley, P.J., Brennan and Bradley, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. David L. Gray, pro se, appeals an order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=150601 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
failure to understand the precise maximum sentence is not a per se due process violation. Id., ¶32
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=141321 - 2017-09-21
failure to understand the precise maximum sentence is not a per se due process violation. Id., ¶32
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=141321 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
and cause remanded with directions. ¶1 BRIDGE, J.1 William Frederick Williams, appearing pro se
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33860 - 2014-09-15
and cause remanded with directions. ¶1 BRIDGE, J.1 William Frederick Williams, appearing pro se
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33860 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
: JAMES R. HABECK, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 CANE, J.[1] Jack Minniecheske, pro se, appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91728 - 2013-01-22
: JAMES R. HABECK, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 CANE, J.[1] Jack Minniecheske, pro se, appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91728 - 2013-01-22
COURT OF APPEALS
. Johnson Carter, pro se, appeals an amended judgment of conviction that commuted a part of his sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144523 - 2015-07-20
. Johnson Carter, pro se, appeals an amended judgment of conviction that commuted a part of his sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144523 - 2015-07-20