Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 41411 - 41420 of 69399 for as he.

State v. Michael E. Carter
appeals an order revoking his supervised release on a Wis. Stat. ch. 980 (2003-04)[1] commitment. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7038 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. James P. Majury
, Majury waived any objections he may have had regarding the admissibility of evidence by not raising them
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11136 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Romondo D. Seymour
for which he was convicted, when his sentence on three counts was reversed and No(s). 98-3233-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14773 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Carl Scott Hitchcock
of endangering safety by negligent handling of a weapon, § 941.20(1)(a), STATS. Hitchcock contends that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9512 - 2017-09-19

State v. George Williams
cannot succeed on a motion to withdraw his guilty plea because he knowingly and voluntarily entered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14697 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Bristol Veterinary Service v. William Schmidt
establishes that reliance on the relationship was consistent with ordinary care. Schmidt argues that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9418 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Susan L. Maginn v. Richard D. Maginn
that he had left a teaching career in 1982 to care for the parties' two children, who were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10640 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] State v. Michael E. Carter
. 980 (2003-04) 1 commitment. He claims he was improperly apprehended by Wisconsin authorities
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7038 - 2017-09-20

Susan L. Maginn v. Richard D. Maginn
evidence that he had left a teaching career in 1982 to care for the parties' two children, who were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10640 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
for failing to previously raise the issues he now seeks to raise. Therefore, we affirm. ¶2 A jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33622 - 2008-08-04