Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 41411 - 41420 of 57581 for id.
Search results 41411 - 41420 of 57581 for id.
[PDF]
County of Clark v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
to the Commission’s decision. Id. We afford “great weight” to the Commission’s determination because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13631 - 2017-09-21
to the Commission’s decision. Id. We afford “great weight” to the Commission’s determination because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13631 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
(quoted source omitted). Therefore, the “stop must not be unreasonable under the circumstances.” Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=171154 - 2017-09-21
(quoted source omitted). Therefore, the “stop must not be unreasonable under the circumstances.” Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=171154 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Mark Hughes v. Stephen Puckett
filing fee provisions inapplicable. Id. at ¶16. ¶7 We agree with Hughes and Puckett that our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5313 - 2017-09-19
filing fee provisions inapplicable. Id. at ¶16. ¶7 We agree with Hughes and Puckett that our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5313 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Patricia Wathen v. Robert Moore
discretionary decisions.’” Id. at 591, 478 N.W.2d at 39 (quoted source omitted). And while the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12386 - 2017-09-21
discretionary decisions.’” Id. at 591, 478 N.W.2d at 39 (quoted source omitted). And while the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12386 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Albert G. Holman
by the trier of fact is supported by sufficient evidence. See id. at 507. On appeal, this court must
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16318 - 2017-09-21
by the trier of fact is supported by sufficient evidence. See id. at 507. On appeal, this court must
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16318 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Virginia R. Ray
, give the language its ordinary meaning. Id. at 225-26. “Statutory language is ambiguous
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5723 - 2017-09-19
, give the language its ordinary meaning. Id. at 225-26. “Statutory language is ambiguous
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5723 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to raise these claims. Id. Additionally, the plea-taking court ascertained Vaughn’s understanding
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=219129 - 2018-09-19
to raise these claims. Id. Additionally, the plea-taking court ascertained Vaughn’s understanding
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=219129 - 2018-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Bryce C. Nelson
unless they are clearly erroneous. Id. ANALYSIS ¶10 Warrantless searches are "per se" unreasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15752 - 2017-09-21
unless they are clearly erroneous. Id. ANALYSIS ¶10 Warrantless searches are "per se" unreasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15752 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
meaning. Id., ¶45. Courts interpret statutory language “in the context in which it is used
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149553 - 2017-09-21
meaning. Id., ¶45. Courts interpret statutory language “in the context in which it is used
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149553 - 2017-09-21
State v. James Sanicki, Jr.
and the facts of record.” Id. at 500. ¶7 A trial court may grant a new trial based on newly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3808 - 2005-03-31
and the facts of record.” Id. at 500. ¶7 A trial court may grant a new trial based on newly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3808 - 2005-03-31