Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 41421 - 41430 of 83366 for case search.
Search results 41421 - 41430 of 83366 for case search.
Donald Rumage v. Robert M. Gullberg
. This is a judgment lien foreclosure case. The issue is whether a properly docketed judgment in favor of Donald
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11421 - 2005-03-31
. This is a judgment lien foreclosure case. The issue is whether a properly docketed judgment in favor of Donald
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11421 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
summary judgment and dismissed it from the case. ¶7 The Saladins appeal from the circuit court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97605 - 2013-06-03
summary judgment and dismissed it from the case. ¶7 The Saladins appeal from the circuit court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97605 - 2013-06-03
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=999800 - 2025-08-26
upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=999800 - 2025-08-26
COURT OF APPEALS
cases against him, one in July and one in November 2007. All three cases grew out of situations where
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57112 - 2010-11-30
cases against him, one in July and one in November 2007. All three cases grew out of situations where
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57112 - 2010-11-30
[PDF]
Diane Jessup v. Banc One Building Management Corporation
on the ground that Jessup failed to establish a prima facie case against Banc One for safe place violations.1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9267 - 2017-09-19
on the ground that Jessup failed to establish a prima facie case against Banc One for safe place violations.1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9267 - 2017-09-19
State v. James M. Stratton
and believed that all matters regarding the case had been dismissed. He did not know that the “refusal portion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3554 - 2005-03-31
and believed that all matters regarding the case had been dismissed. He did not know that the “refusal portion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3554 - 2005-03-31
WI App 132 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2012AP2191-CR Complete Titl...
2013 WI App 132 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2012AP2191-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103245 - 2013-11-19
2013 WI App 132 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2012AP2191-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103245 - 2013-11-19
COURT OF APPEALS
that reintroduced a felony charge. McCoy was already released on a signature bond on this case, but he remained
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34993 - 2008-12-22
that reintroduced a felony charge. McCoy was already released on a signature bond on this case, but he remained
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34993 - 2008-12-22
[PDF]
NOTICE
by considering improper factors; (2) a United States Supreme Court case decided after his sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=48903 - 2014-09-15
by considering improper factors; (2) a United States Supreme Court case decided after his sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=48903 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Tecia D.B.
assigned to Tecia’s case in September 1997, testified that Tecia’s visits with her children were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6836 - 2017-09-20
assigned to Tecia’s case in September 1997, testified that Tecia’s visits with her children were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6836 - 2017-09-20