Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 41421 - 41430 of 68758 for had.

COURT OF APPEALS
. The property had been subject to a federal forfeiture proceeding after Altman was arrested for manufacturing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49632 - 2010-05-03

State v. Richard A. Cooper
). Here, Cooper admitted through his trial counsel that he had no information to indicate how anyone may
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10574 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Werner W. Brandt v. Wisconsin Department of Revenue
was not entitled to certain capital loss carry forwards he had claimed on his tax returns for the years 1979
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12670 - 2017-09-21

New Lagoon Campground Condominium Association v. Polk County Board of Adjustment
Lagoon argues that the Board had an obligation to grant it a set-back variance to build storage sheds
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9308 - 2005-03-31

Donald Minniecheske v. Shawano County
proceedings. They are not final under ยง 808.03(1), Stats. At the time of his appeal, the trial court had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9483 - 2005-03-31

Frontsheet
trial was redacted so as to make it appear that the defendant had contradicted herself on the material
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=119782 - 2014-08-19

2007 WI 62
: This review pertains only to the five Marquardt defendants. A different group, the "Clark" defendants, had
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29209 - 2007-05-23

George D. French, Jr. v. Ronald R. Fiedler
informed Orde that it had acquired ownership and, based on highway widening plans at the time, the signs
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10810 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] George D. French, Jr. v. Ronald R. Fiedler
. In fact, in an April 3, 1989, letter, the State informed Orde that it had acquired ownership and, based
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10810 - 2017-09-20

Richard John Kusch v. James Palmquist, M.D.
his claim of medical malpractice. On appeal, Kusch argues that he had no obligation to obtain expert
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9974 - 2005-03-31