Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 41421 - 41430 of 59698 for quit claim deed/1000.

[PDF] Village of Jackson v. Richard P. Hamann, Jr.
the initial stop of his vehicle by Laabs. His only claim is that Laabs did not have probable cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11194 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 29, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court o...
767, 792, 440 N.W.2d 317 (1989). To show prejudice in his ineffectiveness claim, Greene would have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28609 - 2007-03-28

[PDF] FICE OF THE CLERK
the sentence and also that the claim was “without merit.” We conclude that the trial court properly
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98998 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] CA Blank Order
not be complete.” Be that as it may, as noted above, the claimed error in this case is specific
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=238831 - 2019-04-09

CA Blank Order
therefore have examined whether there is any arguable merit to a claim that the charge was duplicitous
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143331 - 2015-06-16

State v. Kenneth J. Smith
also claimed that he purchased drugs from the district attorney's brother. Even though the district
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9578 - 2005-03-31

State v. David Villalobos
. Thus, Villalobos narrows his credit claim in this case to the remaining twenty-three days of “unused
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8089 - 2005-03-31

State v. Gary Cembrowski
, Cembrowski moved to withdraw his plea, claiming that he had not understood the elements of the crime
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12111 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] NOTICE
with a prohibited alcohol concentration (second offense).2 He appeals, claiming that the circuit court erred when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=49411 - 2014-09-15

Engelking Corporation v. Village of Superior
in small claims court for the return of the money. It argued the Village improperly charged fees for sewer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7621 - 2005-03-31