Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 41451 - 41460 of 75049 for judgment for us.
Search results 41451 - 41460 of 75049 for judgment for us.
State v. David J. Roberson
by the court of appeals affirming both his judgment of conviction for delivery of a controlled substance
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25747 - 2006-06-29
by the court of appeals affirming both his judgment of conviction for delivery of a controlled substance
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25747 - 2006-06-29
[PDF]
State v. John C. Setagord
, as modified by the formula under s. 302.11(1) and subject to extension using the formulas under s. 302.11(2
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16982 - 2017-09-21
, as modified by the formula under s. 302.11(1) and subject to extension using the formulas under s. 302.11(2
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16982 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Charles C. Downing
, as modified by the formula under s. 302.11(1) and subject to extension using the formulas under s. 302.11(2
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17111 - 2017-09-21
, as modified by the formula under s. 302.11(1) and subject to extension using the formulas under s. 302.11(2
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17111 - 2017-09-21
State v. John C. Setagord
by Setagord persuades us that Wis. Stat. § 973.041(1)(b) is not clear on its face, nor that it must be read
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16982 - 2005-03-31
by Setagord persuades us that Wis. Stat. § 973.041(1)(b) is not clear on its face, nor that it must be read
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16982 - 2005-03-31
State v. Charles C. Downing
by Setagord persuades us that Wis. Stat. § 973.041(1)(b) is not clear on its face, nor that it must be read
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17111 - 2005-03-31
by Setagord persuades us that Wis. Stat. § 973.041(1)(b) is not clear on its face, nor that it must be read
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17111 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the confidentiality of these proceedings, we use pseudonyms to refer to the parties in this case. Nos
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=734390 - 2023-11-28
the confidentiality of these proceedings, we use pseudonyms to refer to the parties in this case. Nos
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=734390 - 2023-11-28
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
appeal using pseudonyms, rather than their initials. No. 2022AP1395 3 ¶4 In May 2022
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=696160 - 2023-08-29
appeal using pseudonyms, rather than their initials. No. 2022AP1395 3 ¶4 In May 2022
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=696160 - 2023-08-29
Donna Walag v. Wisconsin Department of Administration
, Interested Party. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Kenosha County: Bruce
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3437 - 2005-03-31
, Interested Party. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Kenosha County: Bruce
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3437 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Donna Walag v. Wisconsin Department of Administration
, INTERESTED PARTY. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Kenosha County: BRUCE E
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3437 - 2017-09-19
, INTERESTED PARTY. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Kenosha County: BRUCE E
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3437 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the confidentiality of these proceedings, we use pseudonyms to refer to the parties in this case. Nos
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=734410 - 2023-11-28
the confidentiality of these proceedings, we use pseudonyms to refer to the parties in this case. Nos
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=734410 - 2023-11-28