Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 41461 - 41470 of 74732 for judgment for us.

2009 WI APP 122
less than $75,000 in damages. Background ¶2 This case is before us on interlocutory appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=38152 - 2009-08-25

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
statements to police should have been suppressed. We affirmed the judgment of conviction. ¶3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=100565 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
with a use-of-a-dangerous-weapon penalty enhancer. Postconviction, Haizel alleged that his plea lacked
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103615 - 2013-10-29

F.M. Management Company Limited Partnership v. Wisconsin Department of Revenue
and policy judgments that require the expertise and experience of an agency, the agency’s decision, although
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6574 - 2005-03-31

Jacqueline C. Schmidt v. Darwin Schmidt
did not expressly authorize the use of telephonic and audiovisual communication in judicial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11898 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN
during the initial term of probation.” He directs us to Wis. Stat. § 304.072(3), which states: [T]he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32888 - 2008-07-29

[PDF] Daniel Harr v. Gerald Berge
not permit us to become a super legislature, to substitute our judgment for that of the legislature. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6929 - 2017-09-20

WI App 72 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2011AP2365 Complete Title of...
was not “imprisoned” as that term is used in Wis. Stat. § 775.05(2) & (3). We disagree with both those contentions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82783 - 2012-08-22

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
a variety of other matters, including his consumption of alcohol and his use of controlled substances
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=120143 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] WI APP 122
less than $75,000 in damages. Background ¶2 This case is before us on interlocutory appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=38152 - 2014-09-15