Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 41481 - 41490 of 59340 for quit claim deed.
Search results 41481 - 41490 of 59340 for quit claim deed.
COURT OF APPEALS
, he claims the scope of the officer’s authority is relevant to the choice-of-law issue presented
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52377 - 2010-07-19
, he claims the scope of the officer’s authority is relevant to the choice-of-law issue presented
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52377 - 2010-07-19
State v. Anthony M. Fletcher
information. In light of our resolution of the first claim of trial court error, we will not discuss
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5317 - 2005-03-31
information. In light of our resolution of the first claim of trial court error, we will not discuss
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5317 - 2005-03-31
Jeanne G. Frawley v. Edward L. Frawley
claims that it is undisputed that, during the marriage, the parties used non-salary distributions from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6911 - 2005-03-31
claims that it is undisputed that, during the marriage, the parties used non-salary distributions from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6911 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
in the no-merit report that there is no arguable merit to seeking plea withdrawal based on a claim that Moore’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=878648 - 2024-11-19
in the no-merit report that there is no arguable merit to seeking plea withdrawal based on a claim that Moore’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=878648 - 2024-11-19
[PDF]
State v. Russell Martin
Martin’s claim that the evidence recited above permitted an inference regarding Carl S.’s prior sexual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10440 - 2017-09-20
Martin’s claim that the evidence recited above permitted an inference regarding Carl S.’s prior sexual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10440 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
Thomas A. Higbee v. Gary L. Higbee, Sr.
existed in the previous sixteen years. Finally, he claims that the court’s “affirmation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13745 - 2014-09-15
existed in the previous sixteen years. Finally, he claims that the court’s “affirmation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13745 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. David G. Alexander
evaluated the machine with the old board. Alexander moved to suppress the Intoxilyzer results, claiming
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11091 - 2017-09-19
evaluated the machine with the old board. Alexander moved to suppress the Intoxilyzer results, claiming
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11091 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
claim that his custodial statement was involuntary due to his “compromised physical and mental
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=215514 - 2018-07-11
claim that his custodial statement was involuntary due to his “compromised physical and mental
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=215514 - 2018-07-11
State v. Frank A. H.
the memorandum. The court found no prejudice to Frank H. ¶10 “There are two components to a claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5061 - 2005-03-31
the memorandum. The court found no prejudice to Frank H. ¶10 “There are two components to a claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5061 - 2005-03-31
City of Monroe v. Steven L. Furgason
probable cause for the arrest. Rather, he claims that the muffler ordinance is unconstitutionally vague
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12282 - 2005-03-31
probable cause for the arrest. Rather, he claims that the muffler ordinance is unconstitutionally vague
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12282 - 2005-03-31