Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 41491 - 41500 of 44730 for part.

State v. Jeffrey L. Loranger
not be unreasonable to infer that a disparity of 100% is unlikely to be explained based upon the year or what part
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3380 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Scot A. Czarnecki
assumed name to endorse the checks. He received the checks from the drugstores as part of his scheme
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15802 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
of the defendant. Id., ¶¶23, 44. In short, the sentencing court must “explain how the sentence’s component parts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=61151 - 2011-03-14

State v. Norman L. Dismuke
Miranda refers not only to express questioning, but also to any words or actions on the part of the police
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5551 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Rheuben McClain
. No. 94-2892-CR -8- crimes arises when such evidence ‘furnishes part of the context
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8232 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Steven H. Roehl v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company
enactment of § 632.32(5)(j). Section 631.36(5), STATS., provides in relevant part: (5) RENEWAL
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13942 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Community Development Authority v. Racine County Condemnation Commission
states, in relevant part: APPEAL FROM AWARD BY OWNER OR OTHER PARTY IN INTEREST. (a) Any party having
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21170 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
this affidavit because it was not part of the circuit court record. We agree with Reyes and refer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=933099 - 2025-03-27

[PDF] Mary Anne Hedrich v. Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System
parties and proceedings for review and states, in relevant part: Except as otherwise specifically
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2843 - 2017-09-19

State v. Bobby R. Dabney
. Stat. § 968.04(3)(a)4 was not satisfied. Section 968.04(3)(a)4 provides in pertinent part
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5656 - 2005-03-31