Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4151 - 4160 of 17239 for probate/1000.
Search results 4151 - 4160 of 17239 for probate/1000.
COURT OF APPEALS
and a consecutive probation term, and was subjected to a restitution determination after he was released from prison
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33995 - 2008-09-16
and a consecutive probation term, and was subjected to a restitution determination after he was released from prison
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33995 - 2008-09-16
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
they located Mr. Manley who also had a probation warrant. When they attempted to take [Mr. Manley
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=798450 - 2024-05-08
they located Mr. Manley who also had a probation warrant. When they attempted to take [Mr. Manley
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=798450 - 2024-05-08
2008 WI APP 189
a reconfinement-ordered incarceration. Wis. Stat. § 302.113(9)(b). “[E]xtended supervision is akin to probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34700 - 2008-12-16
a reconfinement-ordered incarceration. Wis. Stat. § 302.113(9)(b). “[E]xtended supervision is akin to probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34700 - 2008-12-16
[PDF]
State v. Gregory J. Libke
probation consecutive to the fifteen-year prison sentence he received in the armed robbery case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9488 - 2017-09-19
probation consecutive to the fifteen-year prison sentence he received in the armed robbery case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9488 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. James F. Emerich
qualified the State’s recommendation for probation with a statement that she had not known at the time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2359 - 2017-09-19
qualified the State’s recommendation for probation with a statement that she had not known at the time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2359 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
in jail, subject to a two-year period of probation, to be served concurrently with two additional terms
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208862 - 2018-02-22
in jail, subject to a two-year period of probation, to be served concurrently with two additional terms
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208862 - 2018-02-22
[PDF]
NOTICE
No. 2005AP2372 2 does not lie to address Singleton’s complaints about sentences and periods of probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26962 - 2014-09-15
No. 2005AP2372 2 does not lie to address Singleton’s complaints about sentences and periods of probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26962 - 2014-09-15
Sharman M. Smith v. Gypsum Supply Company
presented on summary judgment are not in dispute. Sharman Smith filed an application for informal probate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11711 - 2005-03-31
presented on summary judgment are not in dispute. Sharman Smith filed an application for informal probate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11711 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
there is no basis to challenge Rasmussen’s sentence after revocation of probation. Rasmussen was advised of his
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=231795 - 2019-01-08
there is no basis to challenge Rasmussen’s sentence after revocation of probation. Rasmussen was advised of his
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=231795 - 2019-01-08
[PDF]
Sharman M. Smith v. Gypsum Supply Company
on summary judgment are not in dispute. Sharman Smith filed an application for informal probate on July 6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11711 - 2017-09-20
on summary judgment are not in dispute. Sharman Smith filed an application for informal probate on July 6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11711 - 2017-09-20