Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 41501 - 41510 of 58510 for speedy trial.
Search results 41501 - 41510 of 58510 for speedy trial.
City of Milwaukee v. Clifton Hampton
the Milwaukee County Circuit Court for a trial de novo, which the trial court granted. Hampton then filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9084 - 2005-03-31
the Milwaukee County Circuit Court for a trial de novo, which the trial court granted. Hampton then filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9084 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. William A. Spring
does not No. 95-3565 -2- recognize or authorize such a form. The trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10157 - 2017-09-19
does not No. 95-3565 -2- recognize or authorize such a form. The trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10157 - 2017-09-19
2009 WI APP 3
(as here), and “the county in which the action is pending … is not a proper place of trial for such action
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35069 - 2009-01-27
(as here), and “the county in which the action is pending … is not a proper place of trial for such action
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35069 - 2009-01-27
[PDF]
Sheldon Vielie v. Aurora Pharmacy, Inc.
judgment, we perform the same function as the trial court and review the matter de novo. Green Spring
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18092 - 2017-09-21
judgment, we perform the same function as the trial court and review the matter de novo. Green Spring
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18092 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Lamardus D. Ford
) and 161.48, STATS., 1993-1994. He claims that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11512 - 2017-09-19
) and 161.48, STATS., 1993-1994. He claims that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11512 - 2017-09-19
State v. Alisha M. Olson
-2000).[1] On appeal, she challenges the trial court’s order denying her motion to suppress statements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3388 - 2005-03-31
-2000).[1] On appeal, she challenges the trial court’s order denying her motion to suppress statements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3388 - 2005-03-31
Susan H. Ripple v. R.F. Technologies, Inc.
, reverse in part, and remand for a trial. ¶2 Susan Ripple, the widow of Michael J. Ripple, brought
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4419 - 2005-03-31
, reverse in part, and remand for a trial. ¶2 Susan Ripple, the widow of Michael J. Ripple, brought
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4419 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
KML Development Corporation v. Clyde Schreiber
of withholdings from that security deposit.2 ¶7 At trial, Lindquist testified that she made an appointment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3947 - 2017-09-20
of withholdings from that security deposit.2 ¶7 At trial, Lindquist testified that she made an appointment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3947 - 2017-09-20
CA Blank Order
Fultz’s trial counsel was ineffective. For reasons explained below, we agree with the conclusion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108193 - 2014-02-16
Fultz’s trial counsel was ineffective. For reasons explained below, we agree with the conclusion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108193 - 2014-02-16
[PDF]
NOTICE
about the websites. The trial court denied both motions. Hoak pled guilty to three counts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34875 - 2014-09-15
about the websites. The trial court denied both motions. Hoak pled guilty to three counts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34875 - 2014-09-15