Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 41511 - 41520 of 56199 for n y c.

[MS WORD] JC-1611T: Dispositional Order - Protection or Services with Termination of Parental Rights Notice (Chapter 48)
responsible for providing services failed to make reasonable efforts. C. Reasonable efforts to place
/formdisplay/JC-1611T.doc?formNumber=JC-1611T&formType=Form&formatId=1&language=en - 2026-03-20

[PDF] State v. Michael E.H.
and GERALD C. NICHOL, Judges. Reversed. ROGGENSACK, J.1 Michael E.H. appeals a dispositional order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12323 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Kycha L.
410, 415 (1984). Section 801.01(2), STATS., provides that “[c]hapters 801 to 847 govern procedure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14194 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
-APPELLANT, V. THE ESTATE OF ARTHUR D. SMITH, SR. C/O CHRIS A. GRAMSTRUP, PERSONAL
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=123698 - 2017-09-21

Town of Barton v. Division of Hearings and Appeals
-appellant, the cause was submitted on the briefs of Richard C. Yde, of Stafford Rosenbaum LLP, of Madison
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3929 - 2005-03-31

State v. Richard A. Brown, Jr.
. Stat. § 980.02(2)(c) (1999-2000)[1]; (2) the trial court erred in failing to strike a juror for cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15233 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] F.M. Management Company Limited Partnership v. Wisconsin Department of Revenue
.” ¶8 A “‘[c]onveyance’ includes deeds and other instruments for the passage of ownership interests
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6574 - 2017-09-19

Raymond J. Topps v. County of Walworth
-appellants, the cause was submitted on the briefs of and oral argument by David C. Williams of Allen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5024 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
: 2023AP1840-CRNM State of Wisconsin v. Joseph W. Falk (L. C. No. 2020CF80) Before Stark, P.J., Hruz
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=760232 - 2024-02-06

COURT OF APPEALS
be counted as one. Austin reasons that the lifetime provision provided for in subsections (b), (c) and (d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=80607 - 2012-04-09