Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 41511 - 41520 of 59340 for quit claim deed.
Search results 41511 - 41520 of 59340 for quit claim deed.
[PDF]
Gail Ann Ernst v. Samuel Adolph Ernst
entitlement to maintenance, his claim that the trial court double counted his pension as an asset subject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8618 - 2017-09-19
entitlement to maintenance, his claim that the trial court double counted his pension as an asset subject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8618 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
recommitment judgment, which he claims was June 4, 2013. ¶5 In Village of Trempealeau v. Mikrut, 2004
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=115428 - 2014-06-25
recommitment judgment, which he claims was June 4, 2013. ¶5 In Village of Trempealeau v. Mikrut, 2004
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=115428 - 2014-06-25
State v. Jesse J. Rabas
Rabas claims that the only facts adduced at the suppression hearing were as follows: While on foot
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2823 - 2005-03-31
Rabas claims that the only facts adduced at the suppression hearing were as follows: While on foot
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2823 - 2005-03-31
State v. Nicholas J. Barbian
that Barbian had claimed to be cocaine was not cocaine. The police then decided to find Barbian to discuss
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18075 - 2005-05-09
that Barbian had claimed to be cocaine was not cocaine. The police then decided to find Barbian to discuss
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18075 - 2005-05-09
CA Blank Order
, no arguable merit to a claim that the court erroneously exercised its sentencing discretion when imposing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104804 - 2013-11-25
, no arguable merit to a claim that the court erroneously exercised its sentencing discretion when imposing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104804 - 2013-11-25
State v. Christopher D. Laurin
for fleeing and eluding—a misdemeanor. Laurin claims that the fleeing and eluding contention of the State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2507 - 2005-03-31
for fleeing and eluding—a misdemeanor. Laurin claims that the fleeing and eluding contention of the State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2507 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
, and Stefan had just eaten and was given a break during the interview. Although he claims he was exhausted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33500 - 2008-07-23
, and Stefan had just eaten and was given a break during the interview. Although he claims he was exhausted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33500 - 2008-07-23
State v. William Staples
a controlled substance (cocaine), contrary to Wis. Stat. § 961.41(1m)(cm)1 (1997-98).[1] Staples claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2697 - 2005-03-31
a controlled substance (cocaine), contrary to Wis. Stat. § 961.41(1m)(cm)1 (1997-98).[1] Staples claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2697 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
to accomplish its stated sentencing objectives. ¶12 Christ alternatively claims the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=137483 - 2015-03-16
to accomplish its stated sentencing objectives. ¶12 Christ alternatively claims the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=137483 - 2015-03-16
State v. Brian K. Rice
brought a postconviction motion seeking resentencing. He claims that his sentence on count three
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6423 - 2005-03-31
brought a postconviction motion seeking resentencing. He claims that his sentence on count three
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6423 - 2005-03-31