Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 41511 - 41520 of 58458 for speedy trial.

Policemen's Annuity and Benefit Fund of the City of Milwaukee v. City of Milwaukee
of Milwaukee. PABF claims the trial court erroneously ruled that: (1) no express or statutory trust
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15372 - 2005-03-31

William Speener v. Donald Gudmanson
] B. Merits of The Appeal ¶17 Speener argues that the trial court erred when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15204 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
trial, the court ultimately entered a judgment in favor of Blank in the amount of $1754.44
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=247572 - 2019-10-01

[PDF] CA Blank Order
of “the circuit court” will refer to Judge Cimpl’s court. No. 2012AP343-CRNM 4 “Whether trial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103235 - 2017-09-21

John Nierengarten v. Lutheran Social Services of Wisconsin and Upper Michigan, Inc.
with their family for adoption. The Nierengartens argue that the trial court erroneously ruled that (1) they have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11186 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] NOTICE
Madeline Square against Toldt Woods’ claims and, therefore, reverse the trial court’s grant of summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33717 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
harsher sentence than it agreed to recommend. He also contends his trial attorney was ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98153 - 2014-09-15

Randy O'Neill v. James Reemer
but a portion of the disputed strip was covered by a concrete driveway used by her. ¶16 The trial court held
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16544 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Guy W. Colstad
been considered by the trial court when assessing whether probable cause supported both Colstad’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4569 - 2017-09-19

State v. Guy W. Colstad
; and (4) the results of the preliminary breath test should not have been considered by the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4569 - 2005-03-31