Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 41531 - 41540 of 59146 for SMALL CLAIMS.
Search results 41531 - 41540 of 59146 for SMALL CLAIMS.
[PDF]
Eau Claire County v. Tamara J. Knuth
while under the influence of an intoxicant (OMVWI). She claims that the trial court erred in denying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15480 - 2017-09-21
while under the influence of an intoxicant (OMVWI). She claims that the trial court erred in denying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15480 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Verdell Toles v. Rod Lanser
for the right to call requested witnesses, and the[ir] records to support his claims. Was it a denial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10697 - 2017-09-20
for the right to call requested witnesses, and the[ir] records to support his claims. Was it a denial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10697 - 2017-09-20
State v. Lawrence R. Peterson
. He claims the evidence was insufficient to support his party-to-battery conviction and he should
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16277 - 2005-03-31
. He claims the evidence was insufficient to support his party-to-battery conviction and he should
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16277 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
addresses whether there would be arguable merit to a claim that Thomas’s no-contest plea was not knowing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=747456 - 2024-01-04
addresses whether there would be arguable merit to a claim that Thomas’s no-contest plea was not knowing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=747456 - 2024-01-04
State v. Timothy Zeilinger
to a reasonable suspicion. ¶8 In support of its claim that the trial court erred, the State compares
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6104 - 2005-03-31
to a reasonable suspicion. ¶8 In support of its claim that the trial court erred, the State compares
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6104 - 2005-03-31
State v. Andres A. Delreal
an order denying one of his postconviction motions. He claims the trial court erroneously exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2336 - 2005-03-31
an order denying one of his postconviction motions. He claims the trial court erroneously exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2336 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jesus R.
and defenses, including claims of constitutional dimension. See State v. Olson, 127 Wis.2d 412, 418, 380 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11792 - 2005-03-31
and defenses, including claims of constitutional dimension. See State v. Olson, 127 Wis.2d 412, 418, 380 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11792 - 2005-03-31
C & B Investments v. Wisconsin Winnebago Health Department
from liability. C & B, however, claims that the Committee and the Health Board waived the Nation's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7705 - 2005-03-31
from liability. C & B, however, claims that the Committee and the Health Board waived the Nation's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7705 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. This is very common.” Consequently, the State disputes Crosby’s claim that “[t]here was no evidence
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1059484 - 2026-01-13
. This is very common.” Consequently, the State disputes Crosby’s claim that “[t]here was no evidence
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1059484 - 2026-01-13
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
in the no-merit report that there is no arguable merit to seeking plea withdrawal based on a claim that Moore’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=878648 - 2024-11-19
in the no-merit report that there is no arguable merit to seeking plea withdrawal based on a claim that Moore’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=878648 - 2024-11-19