Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 41531 - 41540 of 63933 for records/1000.

GPI Corporation v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
supported by the record. GPI’s most profound quarrel with the summary was its characterization of Brian
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24767 - 2006-04-10

State v. Larry T.E.
493, 501 (1991). This court will uphold a discretionary determination if the record reflects
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12958 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
, are not part of the appellate record and will not be considered. See Jenkins v. Sabourin, 104 Wis. 2d 309, 313
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73673 - 2012-01-22

State v. Arthur Foster
in the attorney conference room at the jail and was not tape recorded. Shortly thereafter, Raebel emerged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10019 - 2005-03-31

State v. Ronald Waites
there was no objection to the peremptory strike. However, the court noted that the record did not suggest a Batson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9966 - 2005-03-31

State v. David J. Fury
, the record showed only that, when the deputy asked the defendant whether he'd been drinking and thereby moved
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9958 - 2012-03-05

State v. Clifton M. Wright
. This finding is supported by record. The trial court determined that the police officer’s testimony concerning
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10817 - 2005-03-31

State v. Antwan Battles
. Regardless, the record demonstrates that Battles’s attempt to prove coercion was woefully inadequate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10871 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
her understanding. The record suggests otherwise. ¶7 Gaszak was entitled to a meaningful
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51363 - 2010-06-29

[PDF] Malcolm, Inc. v. Eau Claire County Board of Land Use Appeals
be denied when the record before the zoning board of appeals “demonstrates that the property owner would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19364 - 2017-09-21