Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 41541 - 41550 of 84008 for case number.
Search results 41541 - 41550 of 84008 for case number.
Wilbur Daye v. Mark A. Bebel
this action for a prescriptive easement and other relief. The case was originally resolved by an oral
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26243 - 2006-08-16
this action for a prescriptive easement and other relief. The case was originally resolved by an oral
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26243 - 2006-08-16
State v. Lisa M. Berger
in this case is whether the trial court erred in denying the Wis. Stat. § 345.421 motion as untimely
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2865 - 2005-03-31
in this case is whether the trial court erred in denying the Wis. Stat. § 345.421 motion as untimely
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2865 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a no-merit report seeking to withdraw as appellate counsel in each of these consolidated cases. See WIS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=986619 - 2025-07-22
a no-merit report seeking to withdraw as appellate counsel in each of these consolidated cases. See WIS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=986619 - 2025-07-22
CA Blank Order
conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99511 - 2013-07-23
conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99511 - 2013-07-23
State v. Frank J. Sackatook, Jr.
that the prosecutor would have to prove the charges beyond a reasonable doubt and “if we had a jury deciding the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3274 - 2005-03-31
that the prosecutor would have to prove the charges beyond a reasonable doubt and “if we had a jury deciding the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3274 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a no-merit report seeking to withdraw as appellate counsel in each of these consolidated cases. See WIS
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=986619 - 2025-07-22
a no-merit report seeking to withdraw as appellate counsel in each of these consolidated cases. See WIS
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=986619 - 2025-07-22
Vernon County v. Richard J. Peterson
the burden of proof in the trial court in drunk driving cases with the scope of our review of the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10500 - 2005-03-31
the burden of proof in the trial court in drunk driving cases with the scope of our review of the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10500 - 2005-03-31
State v. Frank J. Sackatook, Jr.
that the prosecutor would have to prove the charges beyond a reasonable doubt and “if we had a jury deciding the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3275 - 2005-03-31
that the prosecutor would have to prove the charges beyond a reasonable doubt and “if we had a jury deciding the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3275 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Peterson, No. 2013AP893, unpublished slip op. (WI App Sept. 5, 2013). In each of those cases, this court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=138428 - 2017-09-21
. Peterson, No. 2013AP893, unpublished slip op. (WI App Sept. 5, 2013). In each of those cases, this court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=138428 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the Dane County District Attorney’s (DA’s) Office to disclose material from a 2008 criminal case in which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=876007 - 2024-11-14
the Dane County District Attorney’s (DA’s) Office to disclose material from a 2008 criminal case in which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=876007 - 2024-11-14