Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 41541 - 41550 of 50514 for our.
Search results 41541 - 41550 of 50514 for our.
[PDF]
State v. Cecil L., Jr.
they are adequate, and that goes to the issue of how long he needs to be subject to our authority. And to me
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5866 - 2017-09-19
they are adequate, and that goes to the issue of how long he needs to be subject to our authority. And to me
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5866 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
him.1 Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=773649 - 2024-03-12
him.1 Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=773649 - 2024-03-12
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, ¶22, 324 Wis. 2d 640, 782 N.W.2d 695 (citation omitted). Our review of counsel’s performance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=396873 - 2021-07-28
, ¶22, 324 Wis. 2d 640, 782 N.W.2d 695 (citation omitted). Our review of counsel’s performance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=396873 - 2021-07-28
State v. Diane R.
argument is that we should exercise our discretion under § 752.35, Stats.[6] We decline to do so
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13597 - 2005-03-31
argument is that we should exercise our discretion under § 752.35, Stats.[6] We decline to do so
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13597 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Kupsky’s own directions. See Pote, 260 Wis. 2d 426, ¶37. ¶17 In light of our decision that trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=216042 - 2018-07-24
Kupsky’s own directions. See Pote, 260 Wis. 2d 426, ¶37. ¶17 In light of our decision that trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=216042 - 2018-07-24
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
(“our inquiry is whether discretion was exercised, not whether it could have been exercised
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=141396 - 2017-09-21
(“our inquiry is whether discretion was exercised, not whether it could have been exercised
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=141396 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI 13
. Upon our review No. 2009AP1099-D 2 of the matter, we conclude identical discipline
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=47448 - 2014-09-15
. Upon our review No. 2009AP1099-D 2 of the matter, we conclude identical discipline
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=47448 - 2014-09-15
2010 WI APP 41
that Rittman was armed with a dangerous weapon; and (2) her belief was reasonable. Under our de novo review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47188 - 2010-03-30
that Rittman was armed with a dangerous weapon; and (2) her belief was reasonable. Under our de novo review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47188 - 2010-03-30
Brian Edward Ritchie v. Robin Lynne Axberg
Wis.2d 686, 692, 484 N.W.2d 371, 374 (Ct. App. 1992). Our standard of review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8283 - 2005-03-31
Wis.2d 686, 692, 484 N.W.2d 371, 374 (Ct. App. 1992). Our standard of review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8283 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
the Grefsheims’ affidavits fail to show that they are entitled to judgment as a matter of law. ¶8 Our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27023 - 2014-09-15
the Grefsheims’ affidavits fail to show that they are entitled to judgment as a matter of law. ¶8 Our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27023 - 2014-09-15